LEADER 03390nam 2200661 a 450 001 9910454166703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-262-29353-6 010 $a0-262-28429-4 010 $a1-4356-5498-6 035 $a(CKB)1000000000536340 035 $a(OCoLC)646754037 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10235148 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000174967 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11163802 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000174967 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10208954 035 $a(PQKB)11422854 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3338900 035 $a(OCoLC)244796523$z(OCoLC)643581958$z(OCoLC)646754037$z(OCoLC)961518556$z(OCoLC)962619935$z(OCoLC)966107164$z(OCoLC)991975842$z(OCoLC)991993226$z(OCoLC)1037924404$z(OCoLC)1038681847$z(OCoLC)1045485426$z(OCoLC)1055369429$z(OCoLC)1065843714$z(OCoLC)1081296342 035 $a(OCoLC-P)244796523 035 $a(MaCbMITP)7964 035 $a(PPN)170239780 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3338900 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10235148 035 $a(OCoLC)244796523 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000536340 100 $a20071113d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aHuman reasoning and cognitive science$b[electronic resource] /$fKeith Stenning and Michiel van Lambalgen 210 $aCambridge, Mass. $cMIT Press$dc2008 215 $a1 online resource (422 p.) 300 $a"A Bradford book." 311 $a0-262-51759-0 311 $a0-262-19583-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [367]-390) and indexes. 330 1 $a"In Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science, Keith Stenning and Michiel van Lambalgen - a cognitive scientist and a logician - argue for the indispensability of modern mathematical logic to the study of human reasoning. Logic and cognition were once closely connected, they write, but were "divorced" in the past century; the psychology of deduction went from being central to the cognitive revolution to being the subject of widespread skepticism about whether human reasoning really happens outside the academy. Stenning and van Lambalgen argue that logic and reasoning have been separated because of a series of unwarranted assumptions about logic." "Stenning and van Lambalgen contend that psychology cannot ignore processes of interpretation in which people, wittingly or unwittingly, frame problems for subsequent reasoning. The authors employ a neurally implementable defeasible logic for modeling part of this framing process, and show how it can be used to guide the design of experiments and interpret results. They draw examples from deductive reasoning, from the child's development of understandings of mind, from analysis of a psychiatric disorder (autism), and from the search for the evolutionary origins of human higher mental processes."--Jacket. 606 $aCognitive science 606 $aReasoning 606 $aLogic 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCognitive science. 615 0$aReasoning. 615 0$aLogic. 676 $a153.4 700 $aStenning$b Keith$0723768 701 $aLambalgen$b Michiel van$f1954-$0723767 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910454166703321 996 $aHuman reasoning and cognitive science$91417042 997 $aUNINA