LEADER 03662nam  2200685   450 
001 9910453786203321
005 20211103115350.0
010   $a3-11-048806-X
010   $a3-11-029001-4
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110290011
035   $a(CKB)2550000001169794
035   $a(EBL)1578682
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001061065
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11985614
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001061065
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11087811
035   $a(PQKB)10148753
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1578682
035   $a(DE-B1597)177219
035   $a(OCoLC)870892272
035   $a(OCoLC)979585185
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110290011
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1578682
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10820070
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL551779
035   $a(OCoLC)865335332
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001169794
100   $a20131206h20142014  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aGrammar without grammaticality $egrowth and limits of grammatical precision /$fGeoffrey Sampson, Anna Babarczy
210  1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDe Gruyter Mouton,$d[2014]
210  4$dİ2014
215   $a1 online resource (360 p.)
225 1 $aTrends in linguistics. Studies and monographs,$x1861-4302 ;$vvolume 254
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-11-028977-6 
311   $a1-306-20528-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFrontmatter --$tPreface --$tAcknowledgements --$tTable of contents --$tList of figures --$tList of tables --$tChapter 1. Introduction --$tChapter 2. The bounds of grammatical refinement --$tChapter 3. Where should annotation stop? --$tChapter 40. Grammar without grammaticality --$tChapter 5. Replies to our critics --$tChapter 6. Grammatical description meets spontaneous speech --$tChapter 7. Demographic correlates of speech complexity --$tChapter 8. The structure of children's writing --$tChapter 9. Child writing and discourse organization --$tChapter 10. Simple grammars and new grammars --$tChapter 11. The case of the vanishing perfect --$tChapter 12. Testing a metric for parse accuracy --$tChapter 13. Linguistics empirical and unempirical --$tChapter 14. William Gladstone as linguist --$tChapter 15. Minds in Uniform: How generative linguistics regiments culture, and why it shouldn't --$tReferences --$tIndex
330   $aGrammar is said to be about defining all and only the 'good' sentences of a language, implying that there are other, 'bad' sentences - but it is hard to pin those down. A century ago, grammarians did not think that way, and they were right: linguists can and should dispense with 'starred sentences'. Corpus data support a different model: individuals develop positive grammatical habits of growing refinement, but nothing is ever ruled out. The contrasting models entail contrasting pictures of human nature; our final chapter shows that grammatical theory is not value-neutral but has an ethical dimension.
410  0$aTrends in linguistics.$pStudies and monographs ;$v254.
606   $aGrammaticality (Linguistics)
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aGrammaticality (Linguistics)
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general.
676   $a415
700   $aSampson$b Geoffrey$f1944-$0196224
701   $aBabarczy$b Anna$01044545
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910453786203321
996   $aGrammar without grammaticality$92470281
997   $aUNINA