LEADER 05406nam 2200697 450 001 9910453448603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-118-87040-9 010 $a1-118-87046-8 035 $a(CKB)2550000001272957 035 $a(EBL)1662689 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001212405 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11720670 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001212405 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11210301 035 $a(PQKB)11535517 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1662689 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1662689 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10858444 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL595084 035 $a(OCoLC)876512446 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001272957 100 $a20140502h20142014 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aOrganizational capacity to do and use evaluation /$fJ. Bradley Cousins, Isabelle Bourgeois, editors 210 1$aDanvers, MA :$cWiley Perodicals,$d[2014] 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (137 p.) 225 1 $aNew directions for evaluation ;$vnumber 141, Spring 2014 300 $aA publication of Jossey-Bass and the American Evaluation Association. 311 $a1-118-87042-5 311 $a1-306-63833-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aOrganizational Capacity to Do and Use Evaluation; CONTENTS; EDITORS' NOTES; References; Research Team Members; Other Contributors; 1 Framing the Capacity to Do and Use Evaluation; Evolving Conceptions of Evaluation Capacity Building; Use and Organizational Evaluation Capacity; Utilization and Evaluation Theory; Professional Standards of Practice; Evaluation and Organizational Learning; Data Use Leads to Data Valuing; Direct Versus Indirect ECB; Framework for Organizational Evaluation Capacity; Assumptions; Conceptual Framework; Implications for Research and Practice; Note; References 327 $a2 Multiple Case Study Methods and FindingsPurpose and Rationale; Study Methods; Methodological Approach; Sample-Case Organizations; Data Collection; Case 1: Dawson College; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Sources of Evaluation Knowledge; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers; Concluding Comments; Case 2: Canadian Mental Health Association; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Evaluation Knowledge and Skill Development; Capacity to Use Evaluation 327 $aEvaluation Enablers and BarriersConcluding Remarks; Case 3: International Development Research Centre; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Sources of Evaluation Knowledge; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers; Concluding Comments; Case 4: Canadian Cancer Society; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Facilitating Evaluative Activities; Facilitating Evaluative Learning; Creating Evaluative Information; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers 327 $aConcluding CommentsCase 5: Canada Revenue Agency; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Sources of Evaluation Knowledge and Skills; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers; Concluding Comments; Case 6: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Sources of Evaluation Knowledge and Skills; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers; Concluding Comments; Case 7: United Way of Greater Toronto (UWGT) 327 $aIntroduction and Study ContextDrivers of Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Sources of Evaluation Knowledge; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers; Concluding Comments; Case 8: Ontario Trillium Foundation; Introduction and Study Context; Drivers for Evaluation; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Capacity to Use Evaluation; Evaluation Enablers and Barriers; Concluding Comments; Notes; References; 3 Cross-Case Analysis and Implications for Research, Theory, and Practice; Cross-Case Summary of Findings; Capacity to Do Evaluation; Capacity to Use Evaluation 327 $aPrincipal Forces and Influences 330 $a Gain a greater understanding of organizational capacity to do and use evaluation and implications for evaluation capacity building (ECB). This volume is unique in that it represents a multiple case study of eight organizations that were committed to ECB. It: Situates the study in terms of ECB theory and researchDelineates a conceptual frameworkPresents case profile reports and the results of a cross-case analysis.Discusses findings in terms of i 410 0$aNew directions for evaluation ;$vnumber 141, Spring 2014. 606 $aEvaluation 606 $aEvaluation$xMethodology 606 $aPerformance standards 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEvaluation. 615 0$aEvaluation$xMethodology. 615 0$aPerformance standards. 702 $aCousins$b J. Bradley 702 $aBourgeois$b Isabelle 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910453448603321 996 $aOrganizational capacity to do and use evaluation$92259552 997 $aUNINA