LEADER 05500nam 2200685 450 001 9910453442203321 005 20200903223051.0 010 $a90-272-7048-1 035 $a(CKB)2550000001272797 035 $a(EBL)1673650 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001181578 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12553052 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001181578 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11144217 035 $a(PQKB)10084791 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1673650 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1673650 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10858537 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL594916 035 $a(OCoLC)876719050 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001272797 100 $a20131220h20142014 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aLet's talk politics $enew essays on deliberative rhetoric /$fedited by Hilde Van Belle, KU Leuven, Campus Antwerpen [and four others] 210 1$aAmsterdam :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2014] 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (216 p.) 225 1 $aArgumentation in context,$x1877-6884 ;$vvolume 6 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-1123-X 311 $a1-306-63665-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aLet's talk politics; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; List of authors; Introduction; Let's talk politics: Introduction; References; Part I. Theory; 1. Aristotle on deliberation: Its place in ethics, politics and rhetoric; References; 2. More than a nice ritual: Official apologies as a rhetorical act in need of theoretical re-concept; 1. Introduction; 2. Official apology/apologia - what's the difference?; 3. Official apologies are not simply large-scale interpersonal apologies; 4. The need for a broader theoretical framework for understanding official apologies 327 $a5. Official apologies defined and exemplified 6. Official apologies read as a form of politics and a means of civic (re)construction; 7. Rhetorical resources for re-conceptualizing official apologies; 8. Conclusion; References; 3. Cultural diversity, globalization, and political correctness: Rhetorical argumentation in multicu; 1. Introduction; 2. Cultural diversity and argumentation; 3. Effects of globalization; 4. Political correctness and its consequences; 5. A rhetorical solution?; 6. Conclusion; References; Part II. Cases 327 $a4. Dialogic voices: A pragma-dialectical approach to R. G. Mugabe's ceremonial speeches Introduction; Aims and method; The pragmatic context; Extended pragma dialectic theory; 'Zimbabwe shall never be a colony again'; UN Summit on climate change; Conclusion; References; 5. Prosodic enhancers of humorous effect in political speeches; Introduction; Research methods; Humor and its functions in rhetoric; Types of humor used in political speeches; Phonological markers and enhancers of humor; Research results; Discussion and conclusion; References 327 $a6. Correlative markers in eu-parliamentary French debate: The case of non seulement mais in compari1. Purpose; 2. Material; 3. Theoretical framework; 4. Shared semantic features; 5. Text-organizational differences; 6. Pragmatic value of et me?me; 7. Pragmatic value of non seulement mais; 8. Concluding remarks; References; 7. British Prime Minister David Cameron's apology for Bloody Sunday; The rhetoric of collective apology; Prime Minister David Cameron's Bloody Sunday apology; Conclusions; References; 8. Entropa: Rhetoric of parody and provocation 327 $aConsensus or conflict as the goal of public debate The rhetorical potential of ambiguity; Analysis of Entropa as an ambiguous vehicle of public debate; An ambiguous potential for public debate; References; 9. US National Security Strategy: Different presidencies, different rhetoric?; 1. Introduction; 2. The National Security Strategy report; 3. Materials and method; 4. Analysis; 5. Discussion and conclusions; Bibliographic references; 10. The Bridge: The rhetorical construction of Barack Obama's biography by David Remnick; A piece of biographical journalism 327 $aTraditional rhetoric and the three types of rhetorical proof 330 $aThe essay describes how Polish members of parliament (MPs) reinvented the institution of parliament (conceived of in its essentially discursive character as parleyment) in the course of the political transition of 1989. The reinvention of "parliamentary democracy" and deliberation in the chamber involved four interrelated developments: rearticulation of the "people" and thereby providing new basis for parliamentary "representation" and for the rhetorical agency of MPs; redefinition and rearticulation of the relationship between parliament and other organs of state power, especially government; 410 0$aArgumentation in context ;$vvolume 6. 606 $aRhetoric$xPolitical aspects 606 $aPersuasion (Rhetoric)$xPolitical aspects 606 $aCommunication$xPolitical aspects 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aRhetoric$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aPersuasion (Rhetoric)$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aCommunication$xPolitical aspects. 676 $a320.01/4 702 $aBelle$b Hilde van 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910453442203321 996 $aLet's talk politics$91946932 997 $aUNINA