LEADER 03334nam  22006612  450 
001 9910453384503321
005 20151005020621.0
010   $a1-107-46164-2
010   $a1-139-89312-2
010   $a1-107-45953-2
010   $a1-107-46874-4
010   $a1-139-62886-0
010   $a1-107-47237-7
010   $a1-107-46523-0
010   $a1-107-47330-6
035   $a(CKB)2550000001138814
035   $a(EBL)1543575
035   $a(OCoLC)859536286
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000999564
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12440503
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000999564
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10952333
035   $a(PQKB)11469623
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139628860
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1543575
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1543575
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10774119
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL538484
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001138814
100   $a20121129d2013||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aToleration in political conflict /$fGlen Newey$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (ix, 227 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a1-107-04032-9 
311   $a1-306-07233-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $gIntroduction: toleration in trouble --$tTolerating politics --$tDemocratic toleration? --$tToleration as sedition --$tThe trouble with respect --$tHow not to tolerate religion --$tLiberty, toleration, security --$tToleration and power --$tTolerating ourselves, tolerating terror --$tToleration, free speech and the right to lie.
330   $aPolitical disputes over toleration are endemic, while toleration as a political value seems opposed to those of civic equality, neutrality and sometimes democracy. Toleration in Political Conflict sets out to understand toleration as both politically awkward and indispensable. The book exposes the incoherence of Rawlsian reasonable pluralist justifications of toleration, and shows that toleration cannot be fully reconciled with liberal political values. While raison d'e?tat concerns very often overshadow debates over toleration, these debates - for example about terrorism - need not be framed as a conflict between toleration and security. Framing them in this way tends to obscure objectionable behaviour by tolerators themselves, and their reliance on asymmetric power. Glen Newey concludes by sketching a picture of politics as dependent on free speech which, he argues, is entailed by the demands of free association. That in turn suggests that questions of toleration are inescapable within the conditions of politics itself.
606   $aToleration
606   $aToleration$xPolitical aspects
606   $aDemocracy$xPhilosophy
615  0$aToleration.
615  0$aToleration$xPolitical aspects.
615  0$aDemocracy$xPhilosophy.
676   $a303.6
700   $aNewey$b Glen$01042526
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910453384503321
996   $aToleration in political conflict$92466826
997   $aUNINA