LEADER 03862nam 2200745 a 450 001 9910453339003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9786612964589 010 $a1-282-96458-5 010 $a1-4008-3727-8 024 7 $a10.1515/9781400837274 035 $a(CKB)2550000001251850 035 $a(EBL)646752 035 $a(OCoLC)701704239 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000483087 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12172713 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000483087 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10529150 035 $a(PQKB)10620713 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000543142 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11352921 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000543142 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10518838 035 $a(PQKB)10928753 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC646752 035 $a(OCoLC)730253621 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse36793 035 $a(DE-B1597)446603 035 $a(OCoLC)979593512 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781400837274 035 $a(PPN)187956502 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL646752 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10442064 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL296458 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001251850 100 $a20060627d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBounding power$b[electronic resource] $erepublican security theory from the polis to the global village /$fDaniel H. Deudney 205 $aCourse Book 210 $aPrinceton $cPrinceton University Press$dc2007 215 $a1 online resource (410 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-691-13830-3 311 $a0-691-11901-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $apt. 1. Traditions and theory -- pt. 2. From the polis to federal union -- pt. 3. Toward the global village. 330 $aRealism, the dominant theory of international relations, particularly regarding security, seems compelling in part because of its claim to embody so much of Western political thought from the ancient Greeks to the present. Its main challenger, liberalism, looks to Kant and nineteenth-century economists. Despite their many insights, neither realism nor liberalism gives us adequate tools to grapple with security globalization, the liberal ascent, and the American role in their development. In reality, both realism and liberalism and their main insights were largely invented by republicans writing about republics. The main ideas of realism and liberalism are but fragments of republican security theory, whose primary claim is that security entails the simultaneous avoidance of the extremes of anarchy and hierarchy, and that the size of the space within which this is necessary has expanded due to technological change. In Daniel Deudney's reading, there is one main security tradition and its fragmentary descendants. This theory began in classical antiquity, and its pivotal early modern and Enlightenment culmination was the founding of the United States. Moving into the industrial and nuclear eras, this line of thinking becomes the basis for the claim that mutually restraining world government is now necessary for security and that political liberty cannot survive without new types of global unions. Unique in scope, depth, and timeliness, Bounding Power offers an international political theory for our fractious and perilous global village. 606 $aSecurity, International$xPhilosophy 606 $aConservatism 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aSecurity, International$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aConservatism. 676 $a355/.0330001 700 $aDeudney$b Daniel$0713657 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910453339003321 996 $aBounding power$91329568 997 $aUNINA