LEADER 04211oam  2200613I  450 
001 9910453131003321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-138-22257-7
010   $a0-203-09724-6
010   $a1-136-22189-1
010   $a1-136-22190-5
024 7 $a10.4324/9780203097243 
035   $a(CKB)2550000001115577
035   $a(StDuBDS)AH25572906
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1377464
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1377464
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10756791
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL515912
035   $a(OCoLC)858601671
035   $a(OCoLC)858861412
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001115577
100   $a20180706d2014      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 12$aA global standard for reporting conflict /$fby Jake Lynch
210  1$aNew York ;$aLondon :$cRoutledge,$d2014.
215   $aX, 193 s
225 1 $aRoutledge research in journalism ;$v7
225  0$aRoutledge research in journalism ;$v7
311   $a0-415-63087-8 
311   $a1-299-84661-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aIntroduction 1. More about good journalism 2. Peace journalism 3. Australia 4. The Philippines 5. South Africa 6. Mexico 7. A Global Standard, and prospects for implementation
330 8 $aA Global Standard for Reporting Conflict constructs an argument from first principles to identify what constitutes good journalism. It explores and synthesises key concepts from political and communication theory to delineate the role of journalism in public spheres. And it shows how these concepts relate to ideas from peace research, in the form of Peace Journalism. Thinkers whose contributions are examined along the way include Michel Foucault, Johan Galtung, John Paul Lederach, Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manuel Castells and Jurgen Habermas. The book argues for a critical realist approach, considering critiques of 'correspondence' theories of representation to propose an innovative conceptualisation of journalistic epistemology in which 'social truths' can be identified as the basis for the journalistic remit of factual reporting. If the world cannot be accessed as it is, then it can be assembled as agreed - so long as consensus on important meanings is kept under constant review. These propositions are tested by extensive fieldwork in four countries: Australia, the Philippines, South Africa and Mexico. A Global Standard for Reporting Conflict constructs an argument from first principles to identify what constitutes good journalism. It explores and synthesises key concepts from political and communication theory to delineate the role of journalism in public spheres. And it shows how these concepts relate to ideas from peace research, in the form of Peace Journalism. Thinkers whose contributions are examined along the way include Michel Foucault, Johan Galtung, John Paul Lederach, Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manuel Castells and Jurgen Habermas. The book argues for a critical realist approach, considering critiques of 'correspondence' theories of representation to propose an innovative conceptualisation of journalistic epistemology in which 'social truths' can be identified as the basis for the journalistic remit of factual reporting. If the world cannot be accessed as it is, then it can be assembled as agreed - so long as consensus on important meanings is kept under constant review. These propositions are tested by extensive fieldwork in four countries: Australia, the Philippines, South Africa and Mexico.
410  0$aRoutledge research in journalism$v7
606   $aViolence$xPress coverage
606   $aSocial conflict$xPress coverage
606   $aWar$xPress coverage
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aViolence$xPress coverage.
615  0$aSocial conflict$xPress coverage.
615  0$aWar$xPress coverage.
676   $a303.6
700   $aLynch$b Jake.$0993983
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910453131003321
996   $aA global standard for reporting conflict$92276054
997   $aUNINA