LEADER 05481nam 2200661Ia 450 001 9910453127503321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-89523-4 010 $a90-272-7330-8 035 $a(CKB)2550000000711175 035 $a(EBL)1083814 035 $a(OCoLC)823388611 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000782965 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12304013 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000782965 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10764603 035 $a(PQKB)10349137 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1083814 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1083814 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10631233 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL420773 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000711175 100 $a20120911d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aConstructions in French$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by Myriam Bouveret, Dominique Legallois 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2012 215 $a1 online resource (293 p.) 225 0 $aConstructional approaches to language ;$vv. 13 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-0435-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aConstructions in French; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Cognitive linguistics and the notion of construction in French studies; 1. Cognitive and enunciative approaches; 1.1 The Guillaumian school; 1.2 Theory of enunciative operations; 1.3 Applicative and cognitive grammar; 2. The notion of construction; 2.1 From Bally to Pottier; 2.2 Construction in the structuralist framework; 2.3 A psychomechanical account of construction; 2.4 Macro-syntax; 3. Conclusion; 4. This volume; References; Part I. Verbal constructions; Verb typology 327 $a1. Towards a macro-typology of French verbs1.1 Heuristics; 1.2 Clusters of constructions; 1.3 Syntactic hierarchy and coercion phenomena; 2. The three basic complementation types and their impact on the verbal lexicon; 2.1 Macro-constructions; 2.2 Semantic hierarchy of syntactic structures: que-clause > inf > NP; 3. The three lexical micro-systems; 3.1 The semantic relation of 'transformation'; 3.2 Three lexical systems; 4. Verb typology and polysemy; 4.1 Typology of meaning extensions; 4.2 Polysemic regularities; References; Appendix; Is there a SE FAIRE V-er passive construction? 327 $a1. Introduction2. Disagreement on the passive SE FAIRE V-er: an overview of the literature; 3. Arguments in favor of a "monoconstructional" account of SE FAIRE V-er; 4. Evidence towards SE FAIRE V-er as a "passive meaning"-bearing unit; 5. A "microsense" account; 6. Conclusion; References; E?tre une/Faire partie de; 1. Introduction; 2. A double constraint; 2.1 NP1 and the question of plurality; 2.2 The dependent relationship between NP0 and NP1; 3. Coercion, profiling, idiomatic phrases; 3.1 Coercion phenomena; 3.2 Profiling variation; 3.3 Idiomatic phrases 327 $a4. Conclusion: Return to dependency and autonomyReferences; GIVE frames and constructions in French; 1. Introduction; 2. 'Give' constructions in corpus; 2.1 Transitive constructions; 2.2 Ranking all the transitive constructions; 2.3 Light verbs and support verbs; 2.4 'Pronominal' constructions; 3. Constructions, idiomaticity, and grammaticality; 3.1 Categories of constructions; 3.2 A case study of [X donner (Y) a? + infinitive ('X give (Y) to be V-ed')]; 3.3 Evidence for constructionality?; 4. Semantics and syntax of [X donner (Y) a? + infinitive ('X give (Y) to be V-ed')] 327 $a4.1 Causation in donner4.2 The polysemy of [X donner (Y) a? + infinitive ('X give (Y) to be V-ed')]; 4.3 The temporal/spatial value of [X donner (Y) a? + infinitive ('X give (Y) to be V-ed')]; 4.4 The modal and causal values of [X donner (Y) a? + infinitive ('X give (Y) to be V-ed')]; 5. Conclusion; References; Aknowledgements; Part II. Acquisition of verbal constructions; Constructing 'basic' verbal constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. Data and method; 2.1 Data; 2.2 Choice of verbs; 2.3 Coding; 3. General results; 3.1 Number of tokens; 3.2 The use of grammatical subjects 327 $a3.3 Number of arguments according to the children's language development over time 330 $aMy concern is the relationships between grammar and expressivity which have always remained represented a minority, if not a marginal, interest in linguistics. The paper deals with the construction 'P, histoire de inf.' (Prends quelques jours de repos, histoire de te changer les ide?es 'take a few days' rest, just to have a break from everything'). It is shown, from a diachronic perspective, that the construction expresses an attitudinal meaning, the speaker's stance. The paper argues that, although expressivity and attitude meaning have usually been relegated to a secondary role 410 0$aConstructional Approaches to Language 606 $aFrench language$xSyntax 606 $aFrench language$xCoordinate constructions 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aFrench language$xSyntax. 615 0$aFrench language$xCoordinate constructions. 676 $a445 701 $aBouveret$b Myriam$0900869 701 $aLegallois$b Dominique$0900870 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910453127503321 996 $aConstructions in French$92013288 997 $aUNINA