LEADER 03339nam 22006732 450 001 9910453013403321 005 20151005020621.0 010 $a1-139-79433-7 010 $a1-316-09020-5 010 $a1-139-22654-1 010 $a1-139-78296-7 010 $a1-107-25477-9 010 $a1-139-77997-4 010 $a1-139-77693-2 010 $a1-283-81803-5 010 $a1-139-77845-5 035 $a(CKB)2550000000708842 035 $a(EBL)1042528 035 $a(OCoLC)824485361 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000755646 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11966203 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000755646 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10731635 035 $a(PQKB)10787135 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139226547 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1042528 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1042528 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10623145 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL413053 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000708842 100 $a20141103d2013|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEvaluating elections $ea handbook of methods and standards /$fR. Michael Alvarez, Lonna Rae Atkeson, Thad E. Hall$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (x, 173 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a1-107-02762-4 311 $a1-107-65305-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aMachine generated contents note: Introduction. Performance-Based Evaluation of Election Administration; 1. The electoral ecosystem; 2. Easily available data for performance evaluation; 3. Measuring the experiences of voters; 4. Measuring the performance of poll workers; 5. Auditing the election ecosystem; 6. Election observation. 330 $aIn competitive and contested democratic elections, insuring integrity is critical. Evaluating Elections shows why systematic analysis and reporting of election performance is important and how data-driven performance management can be used by election officials to improve elections. The authors outline how performance management systems can function in elections and their benefits for voters, candidates and political parties. Journalists, election administrators and even candidates often ask whether recent elections were run well, whether there were problems in the administration of a particular state's elections and how well elections were run across the country. The authors explain that such questions are difficult to answer because of the complexity of election administration and because there is currently no standard or accepted framework to assess the general quality of an election. 606 $aElections$zUnited States$vHandbooks, manuals, etc 606 $aElections$vHandbooks, manuals, etc 615 0$aElections 615 0$aElections 676 $a324.6/5 700 $aAlvarez$b R. Michael$f1964-$0850881 702 $aAtkeson$b Lonna Rae$f1965- 702 $aHall$b Thad E$g(Thad Edward),$f1968- 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910453013403321 996 $aEvaluating elections$91899796 997 $aUNINA