LEADER 01021nam0-2200349---450- 001 990009909760403321 005 20160613174727.0 010 $a978-88-207-5833-2 035 $a000990976 035 $aFED01000990976 035 $a(Aleph)000990976FED01 035 $a000990976 100 $a20141023d2012----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a--------001yy 200 1 $a<>mercato dei corpi$epolitiche di contrasto e vie di fuga$fa cura di Anna Rita Calabṛ 210 $aNapoli$cLiguori$d2012 215 $aXIV, 126 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aDomini$iStudi sull'identità$v5 610 0 $aProstituzione$aAspetti sociali 610 0 $aImmigrate$aSfruttamento$aAspetti sociali 676 $a306.74$v22$zita 676 $a304.82$v22$zita 702 1$aCalabṛ,$bAnna Rita 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990009909760403321 952 $a306.74 CAL 1$b17798/71$fBFS 959 $aBFS 996 $aMercato dei corpi$9831753 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00891nam--2200337---450- 001 990001950330203316 005 20050727151821.0 035 $a000195033 035 $aUSA01000195033 035 $a(ALEPH)000195033USA01 035 $a000195033 100 $a20040824d1964----km-y0itay0103----ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $aDylan Thomas$fDerek Stanford 210 $aLondon$cNevillespearman$d1964 215 $a212 p.$d20 cm. 410 0$12001 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 700 1$aSTANFORD,$bDerek$0166577 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990001950330203316 951 $aVII.3.B. 1400(II i C 859)$b41324 L.M.$cII i 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aSIAV8$b10$c20040824$lUSA01$h1105 979 $aCOPAT5$b90$c20050727$lUSA01$h1518 996 $aDylan Thomas$9165798 997 $aUNISA LEADER 03764nam 22007212 450 001 9910452978603321 005 20151005020622.0 010 $a1-107-23272-4 010 $a1-139-85339-2 010 $a1-107-25321-7 010 $a1-139-84194-7 010 $a1-139-84430-X 010 $a1-139-01799-3 010 $a1-139-83956-X 010 $a1-283-83595-9 010 $a1-139-84075-4 035 $a(CKB)2550000000708924 035 $a(EBL)1057449 035 $a(OCoLC)818862315 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000759226 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11451184 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000759226 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10781673 035 $a(PQKB)11654784 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139017992 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1057449 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1057449 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10628040 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL414845 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000708924 100 $a20110216d2012|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aBoundary control $esubnational authoritarianism in federal democracies /$fEdward L. Gibson, Northwestern University$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (ix, 192 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge studies in comparative politics 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-19223-4 311 $a0-521-12733-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Territorial politics and subnational democratization: charting the theoretical landscape; 3. Subnational authoritarianism in the United States: boundary control and the "Solid South"; 4. Boundary control in democratizing Argentina; 5. Boundary control in democratizing Mexico; 6. Boundary control: comparisons and conclusions. 330 $aThe democratization of a national government is only a first step in diffusing democracy throughout a country's territory. Even after a national government is democratized, subnational authoritarian 'enclaves' often continue to deny rights to citizens of local jurisdictions. Gibson offers new theoretical perspectives for the study of democratization in his exploration of this phenomenon. His theory of 'boundary control' captures the conflict pattern between incumbents and oppositions when a national democratic government exists alongside authoritarian provinces (or 'states'). He also reveals how federalism and the territorial organization of countries shape how subnational authoritarian regimes are built and how they unravel. Through a novel comparison of the late nineteenth-century American 'Solid South' with contemporary experiences in Argentina and Mexico, Gibson reveals that the mechanisms of boundary control are reproduced across countries and historical periods. As long as subnational authoritarian governments coexist with national democratic governments, boundary control will be at play. 410 0$aCambridge studies in comparative politics. 606 $aFederal government 606 $aSubnational governments 606 $aAuthoritarianism 606 $aCentral-local government relations 615 0$aFederal government. 615 0$aSubnational governments. 615 0$aAuthoritarianism. 615 0$aCentral-local government relations. 676 $a320.4/049 700 $aGibson$b Edward L.$0746588 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910452978603321 996 $aBoundary control$92483290 997 $aUNINA