LEADER 05331nam 2200661Ia 450 001 9910452955603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-78190-921-0 035 $a(CKB)2550000001104532 035 $a(EBL)1325126 035 $a(OCoLC)880245174 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000970979 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11607522 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000970979 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10929367 035 $a(PQKB)11603195 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1325126 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1325126 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10739175 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL506077 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001104532 100 $a20130801d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aInstitutional logics in action$b[electronic resource] $hPart B /$fedited by Eva Boxenbaum, Michael Lounsbury 210 $aBradford $cEmerald Group Publishing Limited$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (395 p.) 225 0$aResearch in the sociology of organizations ;$vv. 39B 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-78190-920-2 311 $a1-299-74826-0 327 $aFRONT COVER; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS IN ACTION, PART B; COPYRIGHT PAGE; CONTENTS; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; ADVISORY BOARD; INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES; EMBEDDED IN HYBRID CONTEXTS: HOW INDIVIDUALS IN ORGANIZATIONS RESPOND TO COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; HOW DO INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCE COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS?; INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL RESPONSES TO EMBEDDEDNESS IN COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; DISCUSSION; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; INSTITUTIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY: LEVERAGING INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY IN PRACTICE; INTRODUCTION; INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY: THE STORY SO FAR 327 $aAMBIDEXTERITY IN THE STRATEGY LITERATURE: A FALSE PROMISE FULFILLING THE PROMISE: INSTITUTIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY IN PRACTICE; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; BEYOND THE FAMILY FIRM: REASSERTING THE INFLUENCE OF THE FAMILY INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC ACROSS ORGANIZATIONS; INTRODUCTION; THEORETICAL OVERVIEW; THE ILLUSTRATIVE CASE OF ITALY AND THE ITALIAN LEGAL SECTOR; DISCUSSION; CONCLUSIONS; NOTE; REFERENCES; PUTTING NEW WINE IN OLD BOTTLES: UTILIZING RHETORICAL HISTORY TO OVERCOME STIGMA ASSOCIATED WITH A PREVIOUSLY DOMINANT LOGIC; THEORETICAL BACKGROUND; METHODS; FINDINGS; DISCUSSION; CONCLUSION; NOTES 327 $aACKNOWLEDGMENT REFERENCES; APPENDIX: KEY TERMS IN RHETORICAL ANALYSIS; IMAGERIES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: VISUAL RECONTEXTUALIZATION AND FIELD-LEVEL MEANING; INTRODUCTION; THE ROLE OF VISUALS IN MEANING CONSTRUCTION; THE ARCHITECTURE OF DISCOURSE; PHENOMENON AND EMPIRICAL CONTEXT; EMPIRICAL DESIGN; THE VISUAL DISCOURSE OF CSR IN AUSTRIA: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION; CONCLUSION AND CONTRIBUTION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX: TOPOI AND ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGES; LOGIC PLURALISM, ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN, AND PRACTICE ADOPTION: THE STRUCTURAL EMBEDDEDNESS OF CSR PROGRAMS 327 $aTHEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: RELATING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS TO ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN AND PRACTICES RESEARCH METHODS; RESULTS; DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; STRANGE BREW: BRIDGING LOGICS VIA INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE AND THE RECONSTITUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE AND IDENTITY RECONSTITUTION; THE SETTING; INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE: BRIDGING LOGICS AND RECONSTITUTING IDENTITY INSIDE AN ORGANIZATION; DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES 327 $aINSTANTIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS: THE ''BUSINESS CASE'' FOR DIVERSITY AND THE PREVALENCE OF DIVERSITY MENTORING PRACTICES LOGICS, ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, AND PRACTICES; ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS AND PRACTICE VARIATION; METHODS; RESULTS; DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION; CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; THE INTERNAL COMPLEXITY OF MARKET LOGICS: FINANCIAL SOPHISTICATION AND PRICE DETERMINATION; PRICE THEORY AND MARKET HOMOGENEITY; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND MARKET HETEROGENEITY; METHODOLOGY; STUDY FINDINGS; DISCUSSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH; DATA GATHERING AND INTERVIEW EFFECTS 327 $aDATA ANALYSIS 330 $aThe Institutional Logics Perspective is one of the fastest growing new theoretical areas in organization studies (Thornton, Ocasio & Lounsbury, 2012). Building on early efforts by Friedland & Alford (1991) to ""bring society back in"" to the study of organizational dynamics, this new scholarly domain has revived institutional analysis by embracing a focus on the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of institutions. In doing so, it has embraced a more practice-centered approach to agency that emphasizes situated interactions, the importance of history, the role of both symbolic and material eleme 410 0$aResearch in the Sociology of Organizations 606 $aOrganizational sociology 606 $aLogic 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aOrganizational sociology. 615 0$aLogic. 676 $a302.35 676 $a302.3501 701 $aLounsbury$b Michael$0925590 701 $aBoxenbaum$b Eva$0925591 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910452955603321 996 $aInstitutional logics in action$92078222 997 $aUNINA