LEADER 03479nam  2200637 a 450 
001 9910452869203321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a3-11-032186-6
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110321869
035   $a(CKB)2550000001096767
035   $a(EBL)1215555
035   $a(OCoLC)851972102
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000801546
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11487053
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000801546
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10794103
035   $a(PQKB)11409922
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1215555
035   $a(DE-B1597)210866
035   $a(OCoLC)853266018
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110321869
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1215555
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10728811
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL503301
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001096767
100   $a20130717d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe rei(g)n of 'rule'$b[electronic resource] /$fDana Riesenfeld
210   $aFrankfurt ;$aNew Brunswick $cOntos Verlag$d2010
215   $a1 online resource (139 p.)
225 1 $aAporia ;$vBd. 2
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-11-032157-2 
311   $a1-299-72050-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $t Frontmatter -- $tTable of Contents -- $tIntroduction -- $tI. Rules, norms, conventions and necessity -- $t1. Why norms are not conventions and conventions are not norms -- $t2. Cavell on normative necessity: The philosopher, the baker, and the pantomime of caution -- $tII. Rules as conventions vs. rules as norms in the rule-following debates -- $t3. What is a rule and what ought it to be -- $tIII. Twisted Language -- $t4. Davidson on rules, conventions and norms -- $t5. Searle on rules (of rationality, conversation and speech acts) -- $tConclusion -- $tReferences -- $tIndex
330   $aThe Rei(g)n of Rule is a study of rules and their role in language. Rules have dominated the philosophical arena as a fundamental philosophical concept. Little progress, however, has been made in reaching an accepted definition of rules. This fact is not coincidental. The concept of rule is expected to perform various, at times conflicting, tasks. Analyzing key debates and rule related discussions in the philosophy of language I show that typically rules are perceived and defined either as norms or as conventions. As norms, rules perform the evaluative task of distinguishing between correct and incorrect actions. As conventions, rules describe how certain actions are actually undertaken. As normative and conventional requirements do not necessarily coincide, the concept of rule cannot simultaneously accommodate both. The impossibility to consistently define 'rule' has gone unnoticed by philosophers, and it is in this sense that 'rule' has also blocked philosophical attempts to explain language in terms of rules.
410  0$aAporia (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) ;$vBd. 2.
606   $aLanguage and languages$xPhilosophy
606   $aRules (Philosophy)
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aLanguage and languages$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aRules (Philosophy)
676   $a121.68 22/ger
700   $aRiesenfeld$b Dana$01034164
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910452869203321
996   $aThe rei(g)n of 'rule$92453112
997   $aUNINA