LEADER 03565nam  22005172  450 
001 9910452854403321
005 20160602124841.0
010   $a83-233-8492-4
035   $a(CKB)2550000000109540
035   $a(EBL)920831
035   $a(OCoLC)818857754
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9788323384922
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC920831
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL920831
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10569617
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000109540
100   $a20140424d2010||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aModernity and what has been lost $econsiderations on the legacy of Leo Strauss /$fedited by Pawel Armada and Arkadiusz Go?rnisiewicz$b[electronic resource]
205   $aFirst edition.
210  1$aKrakow :$cJagiellonian University Press,$d2010.
215   $a1 online resource (181 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 May 2016).
311   $a83-233-2965-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $aCONTENTS; THE QUESTION OF MODERNITY MEETS THE QUESTION OF LEO STRAUSS; WHY LEO STRAUSS? FOUR ANSWERS AND ONE CONSIDERATION CONCERNING THE USES AND DISADVANTAGESOF THE SCHOOL FOR THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIFE; LEO STRAUSS AND THE CONTEMPORARY RETURN TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY; PHILOSOPHY AS THE RIGHT WAY OF LIFE IN NATURAL RIGHT AND HISTORY; THE PHILOSOPHER'S ANCIENT CLOTHES: LEO STRAUSS ON PHILOSOPHY AND POETRY; LEO STRAUSS AS ERZIEHER: THE DEFENSE OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIFE OR THE DEFENSE OF LIFE AGAINST PHILOSOPHY?; MODERN CHALLENGES - PLATONIC RESPONSES: STRAUSS, ARENDT, VOEGELIN
327   $aKARL LO?WITH AND LEO STRAUSS ON MODERNITY, SECULARIZATION, AND NIHILISMREMARKS ON THE STRAUSS-KOJE?VE DIALOGUE AND ITS PRESUPPOSITIONS; CARL SCHMITT AND HIS CRITIC; POSTMODERNISM AND THE ART OF WRITING: THE IMPORTANCE OF LEO STRAUSS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY; LEO STRAUSS'S GYNAIKOLOGIA; CONTRIBUTORS; NAME INDEX; SUBJECT INDEX
330   $aThe title of this volume appears to suggest that modernity is somehow devoid of something of utmost importance. Sixteen years after the death of Leo Strauss, certainly one of the most profound thinkers in the twentieth century, the model of liberal democracy has been declared victorious, not to say final and true. Due to unrestrained acceptance of such a perspective, a real tension between human beings disappears as there is only one way of being 'correct'. Having taken it into consideration, we point toward something that goes beyond the discussion about the pros and cons of liberal democracy. It would be presumptuous to believe that the current embrace of the liberal-democratic model of culture has definitely settled the question, 'How to live?' And if modernity threatens to silence this most important question, or to neglect its importance as seen by common sense, it seems all the more important to show that the contemporary answers fall short of being self-evident.
517 3 $aModernity & What Has Been Lost
606   $aCivilization, Modern$xPhilosophy
606   $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy
615  0$aCivilization, Modern$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy.
676   $a320.092
702   $aArmada$b Pawe?
702   $aGórnisiewicz$b Arkadiusz
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910452854403321
996   $aModernity and what has been lost$92472651
997   $aUNINA