LEADER 03696nam 22006252 450 001 9910452675003321 005 20151005020621.0 010 $a1-139-88908-7 010 $a1-139-57959-2 010 $a1-139-57277-6 010 $a1-139-15218-1 010 $a1-139-57354-3 010 $a1-139-56921-X 010 $a1-139-57102-8 010 $a1-283-63873-8 010 $a1-139-57011-0 035 $a(CKB)2550000000707816 035 $a(EBL)1025052 035 $a(OCoLC)815389329 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000721086 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11406856 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000721086 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10670047 035 $a(PQKB)10907947 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139152181 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1025052 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1025052 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10608469 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL395119 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000707816 100 $a20110914d2012|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aLegal responses to religious practices in the United States $eaccommodation and its limits /$fedited by Austin Sarat$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (xi, 311 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a1-107-69244-X 311 $a1-107-02368-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $gIntroduction.$tThe sacred and the profane in American law /$rAustin Sarat --$tA history of ambivalence : how religion and U.S. law have developed together /$rAmanda Porterfield --$tReligion's accommodation to American law and culture /$rTimothy Hoff --$tHow should liberal democracies respond to faith-based groups that advocate discrimination? : State funding and nonprofit status /$rCorey Brettschneider --$tFreedom of speech, equal citizenship, and the anticaste principle : a commentary on regulating hate speech /$rBryan K. Fair --$tExpanding the Bob Jones compromise /$rCaroline Mala Corbin --$tReligious practice and sex discrimination : an uneasy case for tolerance /$rMeredith Render --$tReligious freedom and the nondiscrimination norm /$rRichard W. Garnett --$tLaw, religion, and kissing your sister /$rPaul Horwitz --$tFreedom of religion or freedom of the church? / Steven D. Smith --$tGovernment for the time being /$rWilliam Brewbaker III. 330 $aThere is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the US Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what 'non-establishment' or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: namely, what practices constitute a 'religious activity' such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices? 606 $aFreedom of religion$zUnited States 615 0$aFreedom of religion 676 $a342.7308/52 702 $aSarat$b Austin 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910452675003321 996 $aLegal responses to religious practices in the United States$92450467 997 $aUNINA