LEADER 01066nam0 22003373i 450 001 CAG0052952 005 20170908093242.0 010 $a8807013576 100 $a20160620d1996 ||||0itac50 ba 101 | $aita 102 $ait 181 1$6z01$ai $bxxxe 182 1$6z01$an 200 1 $aEva Luna$fIsabel Allende$gtraduzione di Angelo Morino 205 $a8. ed 210 $aMilano$cFeltrinelli$d1996 215 $a267 p.$d22 cm. 225 | $aNarratori 410 0$1001CFI0062300$12001 $aNarratori 500 10$aEva Luna.$3CFI0119349$9CFIV016588$91265808 606 $aNarrativa$2FIR$3NAPC115900$9I 676 $a863.64$9NARRATIVA SPAGNOLA, 1945-$v21 700 1$aAllende$b, Isabel$3CFIV016588$4070$0285695 702 1$aMorino$b, Angelo$3CFIV011742 801 3$aIT$bIT-NA0079$c20160620 850 $aIT-NA0299 912 $aCAG0052952 950 0$aBiblioteca comunale di Afragola$d AGII B.7.10$e AG 0000092215 $fB $h20151112$i20151112 977 $a AG 996 $aEva Luna$91265808 997 $aUNISANNIO LEADER 04072nam 2200625Ia 450 001 9910452633403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-674-07528-5 010 $a0-674-07526-9 024 7 $a10.4159/harvard.9780674075269 035 $a(CKB)2550000001038974 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH25018213 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000834821 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11412031 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000834821 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10982141 035 $a(PQKB)11419963 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3301240 035 $a(DE-B1597)209845 035 $a(OCoLC)828869697 035 $a(OCoLC)979629339 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674075269 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3301240 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10664496 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001038974 100 $a20120822d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAdam Ferguson in the Scottish enlightenment $b[electronic resource] $ethe Roman past and Europe's future /$fIain McDaniel 210 $aCambridge, Mass. $cHarvard University Press$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (x,) 300 $aFormerly CIP.$5Uk 311 $a0-674-07296-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $t Frontmatter -- $tContents -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIntroduction -- $t1 Montesquieu and the Unfree Republic -- $t2 Military Government and Empire in the Scottish Enlightenment -- $t3 Ferguson and the Moral Foundations of Civil Society -- $t4 Trajectories of the Modern Commercial State -- $t5 Britain's Future in a Roman Mirror -- $t6 Civil- Military Union and the Modern State -- $t7 Revolution and Modern Republicanism -- $tConclusion -- $tAbbreviations -- $tNotes -- $tIndex 330 $aAlthough overshadowed by his contemporaries Adam Smith and David Hume, the Scottish philosopher Adam Ferguson strongly influenced eighteenth-century currents of political thought. A major reassessment of this neglected figure, Adam Ferguson in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Roman Past and Europe's Future sheds new light on Ferguson as a serious critic, rather than an advocate, of the Enlightenment belief in liberal progress. Unlike the philosophes who looked upon Europe's growing prosperity and saw confirmation of a utopian future, Ferguson saw something else: a reminder of Rome's lesson that egalitarian democracy could become a self-undermining path to dictatorship. Ferguson viewed the intrinsic power struggle between civil and military authorities as the central dilemma of modern constitutional governments. He believed that the key to understanding the forces that propel nations toward tyranny lay in analysis of ancient Roman history. It was the alliance between popular and militaristic factions within the Roman republic, Ferguson believed, which ultimately precipitated its downfall. Democratic forces, intended as a means of liberation from tyranny, could all too easily become the engine of political oppression-a fear that proved prescient when the French Revolution spawned the expansionist wars of Napoleon. As Iain McDaniel makes clear, Ferguson's skepticism about the ability of constitutional states to weather pervasive conditions of warfare and emergency has particular relevance for twenty-first-century geopolitics. This revelatory study will resonate with debates over the troubling tendency of powerful democracies to curtail civil liberties and pursue imperial ambitions. 606 $aEnlightenment$zScotland 606 $aRepublicanism$zRome$xHistory 607 $aGreat Britain$xPolitics and government 607 $aRome$xPolitics and government 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEnlightenment 615 0$aRepublicanism$xHistory. 676 $a321.8/6 700 $aMcDaniel$b Iain$f1975-$01031473 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910452633403321 996 $aAdam Ferguson in the Scottish enlightenment$92448878 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03924 am 2200601 n 450 001 9910131357003321 005 20141224 010 $a2-11-139919-1 035 $a(CKB)3710000000497149 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-deps-135 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43840 035 $a(PPN)18931382X 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000497149 100 $a20150708j|||||||| ||| 0 101 0 $afre 135 $auu||||||m|||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aLes connaissances artistiques des Français $eÉléments de comparaison, 1988-2008 /$fOlivier Donnat 210 $aParis $cDépartement des études, de la prospective et des statistiques$d2014 215 $a1 online resource (16 p.) 330 $aMolière, Beckett, Kandinsky, Pina Bausch, Gainsbourg, Mahler, Dalí? : les noms de trente artistes couvrant la plupart des formes artistiques, des plus populaires aux plus légitimes, ont été proposés dans le cadre de l?enquête Pratiques culturelles des Français en 1988 et en 2008, afin de disposer, au-delà des pratiques, d?une mesure des connaissances artistiques des Français. Chaque personne interrogée devait indiquer si elle les connaissait et, le cas échéant, quelle était son opinion à leur égard. La comparaison des résultats à vingt ans d?écart montre que la proportion de Français déclarant spontanément connaître les artistes de la liste ne serait-ce que de nom a progressé en vingt ans dans la grande majorité des cas, mais que la véritable connaissance, en revanche, mesurée par la capacité à préciser le domaine d?activité de l?artiste, est restée stable. Cette stabilité masque une double dynamique générationnelle : la connaissance des artistes a progressé parmi les générations nées avant la moitié des années 1960 mais recule parmi les jeunes générations âgées de moins de 45 ans. Cette érosion générationnelle concerne tous les noms de la liste relevant de la culture scolaire ou classique, à l?exception des grands noms du patrimoine artistique ? Molière, Mozart et Van Gogh ? dont la notoriété a progressé : ainsi Flaubert, Nerval mais aussi Mahler ou Boulez sont non seulement moins connus des jeunes générations mais également moins appréciés, signe d?un effacement relatif de la légitimité de la culture scolaire ou cultivée. Molière, Beckett, Kandinsky, Pina Bausch, Gainsbourg, Mahler and Dalí are amongst the names of thirty artists covering a wide variety of artistic forms, from popular culture to high culture, listed in the 1988 and 2008 surveys on Pratiques culturelles des Français (French cultural practices),designed to go beyond practices to examine the general cultural knowledge in the French population. Each person surveyed is asked to state whether they? 517 $aconnaissances artistiques des Français 606 $aSociology 606 $aCultural studies 606 $acultural participation 606 $acultural knowledge 606 $ageneration 606 $apratiques culturelles 606 $aconnaissances culturelles 606 $aanalyse générationnelle 606 $agénération 606 $aartistes 610 $ageneration 610 $acultural knowledge 610 $acultural participation 615 4$aSociology 615 4$aCultural studies 615 4$acultural participation 615 4$acultural knowledge 615 4$ageneration 615 4$apratiques culturelles 615 4$aconnaissances culturelles 615 4$aanalyse générationnelle 615 4$agénération 615 4$aartistes 700 $aDonnat$b Olivier$01254951 801 0$bFR-FrMaCLE 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910131357003321 996 $aLes connaissances artistiques des Français$93033642 997 $aUNINA