LEADER 03172nam 2200613Ia 450 001 9910452407503321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-4755-1887-0 010 $a1-4755-7069-4 035 $a(CKB)2550000000106446 035 $a(EBL)1606753 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000944116 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11595730 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000944116 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10982532 035 $a(PQKB)10754404 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1606753 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1606753 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10569530 035 $a(OCoLC)870244916 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000106446 100 $a20111102d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aVolatility trap$b[electronic resource] $eprecautionary saving, investment, and aggregate risk /$fprepared by Reda Cherif and Fuad Hasanov 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cInternational Monetary Fund$dc2012 215 $a1 online resource (23 p.) 225 0 $aIMF working paper ;$v12/134 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4755-9955-2 311 $a1-4755-0386-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aCover; Abstract; Contents; Introduction; II. A "Store-or-Sow" Model of Precautionary Saving and Investment; III. Results and Implications; Figures; 1. Precautionary Saving and the Golden Rule Investment Rate; 2. A Phase Diagram of Precautionary Saving and Investment Rates; 3. Precautionary Saving and Investment Rates vs. Volatility of Permanent Shocks; 4. Precautionary Saving and Investment Rates vs. Volatility of Temporary Shocks; IV. An Empirical Relationship Among Investment, Saving, and Volatility; Tables; 1. Saving, Investment, and Volatility: Descriptive Statistics 327 $a5. Saving vs. Investment6. Saving vs. Investment-Saving Ratio; V. Concluding Remarks; 2. Panel Fixed Effects Regressions; References; Appendix Table. Average Investment, Saving, and Volatility (1970-2008) 330 $aWe study the effects of permanent and temporary income shocks on precautionary saving and investment in a ""store-or-sow"" model of growth. High volatility of permanent shocks results in high precautionary saving in the safe asset and low investment, or a ""volatility trap."" Namely, big savers invest relatively little. In contrast, low volatility of permanent shocks leads to low precautionary saving and high or low investment, depending on the volatility of temporary shocks. Empirical evidence shows a nonlinear relationship between investment and saving and that investment is a hump-shaped fu 410 0$aIMF Working Papers 606 $aRisk 606 $aSaving and investment 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aRisk. 615 0$aSaving and investment. 700 $aCherif$b Reda$0882104 701 $aHasanov$b Fuad$f1978-$0882105 712 02$aInternational Monetary Fund. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910452407503321 996 $aVolatility trap$92094351 997 $aUNINA