LEADER 01069nam0 22002771i 450 001 SUN0009582 005 20060509120000.0 010 $a88-495-0355-5 100 $a20021115d2001 |0itac50 ba 101 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a|||| ||||| 200 1 $aˆLa ‰condanna nelle spese giudiziali$fGiuseppe Chiovenda$gpresentazione di Franco Cipriani 205 $aRistampa anastatica 210 $aNapoli$cEdizioni scientifiche italiane$d2001 215 $a456 p.$d22 cm. 620 $dNapoli$3SUNL000005 700 1$aChiovenda$b, Giuseppe$3SUNV002879$0133647 702 1$aCipriani$b, Giuseppe$3SUNV007482 712 $aESI$3SUNV000952$4650 801 $aIT$bSOL$c20181109$gRICA 912 $aSUN0009582 950 $aUFFICIO DI BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI GIURISPRUDENZA$d00 CONS XVI.Ea.16 $e00 21529 995 $aUFFICIO DI BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI GIURISPRUDENZA$h21529$kCONS XVI.Ea.16$oc$qa 996 $aCondanna nelle spese giudiziali$9227195 997 $aUNICAMPANIA LEADER 02731nam 2200589 a 450 001 9910451888303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8147-6917-9 010 $a0-8147-7676-0 010 $a1-4294-9023-3 035 $a(CKB)1000000000476559 035 $a(EBL)865895 035 $a(OCoLC)784884475 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000198876 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11172339 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000198876 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10171738 035 $a(PQKB)10605206 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC865895 035 $a(OCoLC)170688861 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse10416 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL865895 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10172675 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000476559 100 $a20061012d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMasters of illusion$b[electronic resource] $ethe Supreme Court and the religion clauses /$fFrank S. Ravitch 210 $aNew York $cNew York University Press$dc2007 215 $a1 online resource (254 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8147-7585-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 193-233) and index. 327 $aBuilding on shadows -- Neutrality -- Hostility -- Liberty -- Equality -- Separationism -- Accommodationism -- The meaning and recognition of religion under the religion clauses -- The ebb and flow of religion clause principles -- The facilitation test. 330 $aMany legal theorists and judges agree on one major premise in the field of law and religion: that religion clause jurisprudence is in a state of disarray and has been for some time. In Masters of Illusion , Frank S. Ravitch provocatively contends that both hard originalism (a strict focus on the intent of the Framers) and neutrality are illusory in religion clause jurisprudence, the former because it cannot live up to its promise for either side in the debate and the latter because it is simply impossible in the religion clause context. Yet these two principles have been used in almost every S 606 $aFreedom of religion$zUnited States$xInterpretation and construction 606 $aChurch and state$zUnited States$xInterpretation and construction 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aFreedom of religion$xInterpretation and construction. 615 0$aChurch and state$xInterpretation and construction. 676 $a342.7308/52 700 $aRavitch$b Frank S.$f1966-$0790803 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910451888303321 996 $aMasters of illusion$92477967 997 $aUNINA