LEADER 06498nam 2200577Ia 450 001 9910451319003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8157-9607-2 035 $a(CKB)1000000000446789 035 $a(OCoLC)559386913 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10063885 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000226526 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11176481 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000226526 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10258375 035 $a(PQKB)10513446 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3004411 035 $a(OCoLC)55898039 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse85484 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3004411 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10063885 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000446789 100 $a20030516d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPreparing for the future$b[electronic resource] $estrategic planning in the U.S. Air Force /$fMichael Barzelay, Colin Campbell 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cBrookings Institution Press$dc2003 215 $a1 online resource (288 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-8157-0844-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 241-256) and index. 327 $g1$tVisioning, Strategic Planning, and Corporate Evolution$g1 --$tThe Degree of Departure from Previous Approaches$g3 --$tThe Role of Organizational Characteristics$g10 --$tContending with Constricted Latitude$g12 --$tExpanding the Horizons for Strategic Planning$g14 --$tSteps for Effective Implementation$g18 --$g2$tPrecursors of Strategic Visioning: Discontinuous Change in the Early Post-Cold War Period$g27 --$tThe Rice-McPeak Era: Supplying the Air Force with a Strategic Vision$g27 --$tThe Gulf War: Changing the Air Force's Self-Conception$g29 --$tAlliance Reversal: The Impact of the Gulf War on the Defense Policy Subsystem$g32 --$tSpace-Based Provision of Military Intelligence$g33 --$tOrigins of the Fogleman-Era Strategic Vision$g35 --$g3$tPlanning with Dialogue and Passion: The Fogleman Round$g37 --$tStrategic Visioning and Long-Range Planning as Policy Management$g39 --$tThe Strategic Planning Agenda$g41 --$tMoving toward the Corona Conference$g52 --$tFrom Strategic Vision to Long-Range Plan$g58 --$g4$tThe Ryan-Peters Round$g62 --$tTaking Stock of the Fogleman Round$g63 --$tThe Next Round: Unfinished Business$g75 --$tThe Ryan-Peters Visioning Process: General Ryan's Approach$g82 --$g5$tUnderstanding Strategic Visioning as a Practice$g95 --$tInnovating the Strategic Visioning Practice$g97 --$tAnalyzing Process Designs for Effective Strategic Visioning: The Fogleman Round$g101 --$tExplaining Performance in the Ryan-Peters Round$g113 --$tCase Comparison: Toward Generalization about Strategic Visioning Practice$g115 --$tThe Air Force Experience in Broader Focus$g119 --$g6$tContinuing Institutional Issues: Planning, Resourcing, and Governance$g121 --$tPlanning and Shifts in Fiscal Circumstances$g122 --$tPersistent Disjunctions between Planning and Programming$g131 --$tFixing the Corporate Structure$g136 --$g7$tThe Process of Implementing Strategic Intent$g155 --$tOrigins of the U.S. Air Force Predator Program$g156 --$tPredator and Strategic Intent$g159 --$tConcurrent Visioning and Implementation$g160 --$g8$tProcesses for Corrective Visioning$g169 --$tThe Aerospace Integration Task Force Case$g170 --$tThe Space Commission: Corrective Visioning in the Defense Policy Subsystem$g182 --$tThe Air Force Futures Games Case$g192 --$g9$tLessons from the Air Force's Efforts to Overcome Incrementalism: Toward Revitalized Governance$g211 --$tTaking the Lessons to a Wider Audience$g213 --$tRevitalizing the Role of Public Service in Government$g215 --$tLinking Policy Foresight and Strategic Intent$g220 --$tLinking Strategic Visioning with Policy and Expenditure Planning and Human Resources and Organizational Planning$g231 --$tLinking Strategic Planning and Policy Management to Implementation$g238 --$tOver to Policy Entrepreneurship$g238. 330 8 $aAnnotation$bWhile the Clinton Administration and federal agencies were busy making government cost less and work better in the near-term, the United States Air Force was regularly visualizing the competencies needed to assure the organization's long-term effectiveness. As a result of steady efforts to prepare for the future conducted under successive secretaries and chiefs of staff, the Air Force has developed a distinctive approach to strategic planning. This approach is fundamentally concerned with ensuring that the organization's future capabilities support effective performance of future tasks. Such tasks are shaped by ever-changing policy objectives and circumstances of implementation. After eight years, the Air Force has not only successfully refined its distinctive approach to strategic planning, but has also leveraged change in programmatic decisions, human resource management, and operational technologies. This study provides an inside look at how the Air Force came to formulate and declare its "strategic intent" for developing the organization's capabilities over a timeline of more than twenty years. Air Force strategic intent is not a plan, but a shared commitment to strengthening specific core competencies and critical future capabilities. Michael Barzelay and Colin Campbell reveal how one of the nation's most significant public organizations has reassessed its own strategic intent. Drawing lessons from the Air Force experience, this book provides a significant contribution to public management research on innovation and executive leadership. One key lesson is that preparing for the future is a responsibility that organizations can discharge effectively if they combine insights withpractical knowledge of executive leadership and the dynamics of policy change. Preparing for the Future provides a fresh argument about innovation and leadership in public management, while breaking new ground in the analysis o. 606 $aMilitary planning$zUnited States 606 $aStrategic planning$zUnited States 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aMilitary planning 615 0$aStrategic planning 676 $a358.4/03/0973 700 $aBarzelay$b Michael$0323092 701 $aCampbell$b Colin$f1943-$0128725 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910451319003321 996 $aPreparing for the future$92132497 997 $aUNINA