LEADER 03252nam 2200649 a 450 001 9910451125703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-281-29218-4 010 $a9786611292188 010 $a1-4411-3916-8 010 $a1-84714-282-6 035 $a(CKB)1000000000406781 035 $a(EBL)436228 035 $a(OCoLC)437129165 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000150806 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11910592 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000150806 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10280892 035 $a(PQKB)10265034 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC436228 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL436228 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10224949 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL129218 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000406781 100 $a20070425d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEvaluation in media discourse$b[electronic resource] $eanalysis of a newspaper corpus /$fMonika Bednarek 210 $aLondon ;$aNew York $cContinuum$dc2006 215 $a1 online resource (270 p.) 225 1 $aCorpus and discourse. Research in corpus and discourse 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8264-9126-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [235]-250) and index. 327 $aContents; Reprint permissions; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations and typographical conventions; Part One: Evaluation and newspaper discourse; 1. Analysing evaluation in the news; 2. The news story in its context; 3. Delimiting evaluation; 4. A new theory of evaluation; Part Two: Evaluation in the press: a corpus-based analysis; 5. Evaluation in the press: core evaluative parameters; 6. Evaluation in the press: peripheral evaluative parameters; Part Three: Empirical and theoretical issues; 7. Evaluation: broadsheets vs. tabloids; 8. Implications for a new theory of evaluation; Appendices 327 $aReferencesIndex; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W 330 $aEvaluation is the linguistic expression of speaker/writer opinion, and has only recently become the focus of linguistic analysis. This book presents the first corpus-based account of evaluation; one hundred newspaper articles collated to form a 70,000 word comparable corpus, drawn from both tabloid and broadsheet media. The book provides detailed explanations and justifications of the underlying framework of evaluation, as well as demonstrating how this is part of the larger framework of media discourse. Unlike many other linguistic analyses of media language, it makes frequent reference to th 410 0$aCorpus and discourse.$pResearch in corpus and discourse. 606 $aDiscourse analysis 606 $aJournalism$xObjectivity$zGreat Britain 606 $aJournalism$zGreat Britain$xLanguage 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aJournalism$xObjectivity 615 0$aJournalism$xLanguage. 676 $a071/.4 700 $aBednarek$b Monika$0719741 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910451125703321 996 $aEvaluation in media discourse$92296518 997 $aUNINA