LEADER 03778nam 22007811c 450 001 9910450774203321 005 20211005073500.0 010 $a1-4725-5982-7 010 $a1-280-80802-0 010 $a9786610808021 010 $a1-84731-059-1 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472559821 035 $a(CKB)1000000000338358 035 $a(EBL)270812 035 $a(OCoLC)476005646 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000230452 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12032461 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000230452 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10196851 035 $a(PQKB)10275613 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772726 035 $a(OCoLC)191747351 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255778 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC270812 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL270812 035 $a(OCoLC)936848015 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000338358 100 $a20140929d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe public law/private law divide $eune entente assez cordiale? = La distinction du droit public et du droit prive : regards franc?ais et britanniques $fedited by Mark Freedland and Jean-Bernard Auby 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2006. 215 $a1 online resource (269 p.) 225 0 $aStudies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law $vv. 2 300 $aPapers from a series of joint seminars between colleagues from the University of Paris II and the Oxford University Law Faculty held in Oxford in July 2000 and in Paris in July 2001 300 $aExtended and re-ordered version of papers previously published in 2004 by LGDJ, Paris 311 $a1-84113-635-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references 327 $aINTRODUCTION GENERALE -- GENERAL INTRODUCTION -- PREMIERE PARTIE -- PART ONE -- APPROCHES FRANAISES -- THE FRENCH VISION -- DEUXIEME PARTIE -- PART TWO -- THE BRITISH VISION -- APPROCHES BRITANNIQUES 330 8 $aThe contributions brought together in this book derive from joint seminars, held by scholars between colleagues from the University of Oxford and the University of Paris II. Their starting point is the original divergence between the two jurisdictions, with the initial rejection of the public-private divide in English Law, but on the other hand its total acceptance as natural in French Law. Then, they go on to demonstrate that the two systems have converged, the British one towards a certain degree of acceptance of the division, the French one towards a growing questioning of it. However this is not the only part of the story, since both visions are now commonly coloured and affected by European Law and by globalisation, which introduces new tensions into our legal understanding of what is "public" and what is "private" 410 0$aStudies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law ;$vv. 2. 517 3 $aDistinction du droit public et du droit prive :$eregards franc?ais et britanniques 606 $aPublic law$zFrance$vCongresses 606 $2Constitutional & administrative law 606 $aPublic law$zGreat Britain$vCongresses 606 $aCivil law$zFrance$vCongresses 606 $aCivil law$zGreat Britain$vCongresses 606 $aComparative law$vCongresses 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPublic law 615 0$aPublic law 615 0$aCivil law 615 0$aCivil law 615 0$aComparative law 676 $a342 702 $aAuby$b Jean-Bernard 702 $aFreedland$b M. R$g(Mark Robert), 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910450774203321 996 $aThe public law$92452902 997 $aUNINA