LEADER 03269nam 2200817Ia 450 001 9910450433503321 005 20211005091652.0 010 $a1-60256-022-6 010 $a1-280-44110-0 010 $a9786610441105 010 $a1-4237-3710-5 010 $a0-19-536129-6 010 $a1-60129-837-4 035 $a(CKB)1000000000028628 035 $a(EBL)241635 035 $a(OCoLC)171571138 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000559286 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12229999 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000559286 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10566866 035 $a(PQKB)10234842 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000236883 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11235169 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000236883 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10191048 035 $a(PQKB)11034200 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC272606 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC241635 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL272606 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10087207 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL44110 035 $a(OCoLC)935260808 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3051927 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL241635 035 $a(OCoLC)935227437 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000028628 100 $a19910423d1992 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aResponsive regulation$b[electronic resource] $etranscending the deregulation debate /$fIan Ayres, John Braithwaite 210 $aNew York $cOxford University Press$d1992 215 $a1 online resource (216 p.) 225 1 $aOxford socio-legal studies 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-19-509376-3 311 $a0-19-507070-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 183-195) and index. 327 $aContents; 1. The Politics of an Idea; 2. The Benign Big Gun; 3. Tripartism; 4. Enforced Self-Regulation; 5. Partial-Industry Intervention; 6. Delegation and Participation in a Responsive Regulatory order; Notes; References; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W; Y; Z; 330 $aThis book transcends current debate on government regulation by lucidly outlining how regulations can be a fruitful combination of persuasion and sanctions. The regulation of business by the United States government is often ineffective despite being more adversarial in tone than in other nations. The authors draw on both empirical studies of regulation from around the world and modern game theory to illustrate innovative solutions to this problem. Their ideas include an argument for the empowerment of private and public interest groups in the regulatory process and a provocative discussion of 410 0$aOxford socio-legal studies. 606 $aTrade regulation 606 $aDeregulation 606 $aIndustrial policy 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aTrade regulation. 615 0$aDeregulation. 615 0$aIndustrial policy. 676 $a343/.08 676 $a342.38 700 $aAyres$b Ian$0560512 701 $aBraithwaite$b John$0257264 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910450433503321 996 $aResponsive regulation$92472163 997 $aUNINA