LEADER 03085nam  22006614a 450 
001 9910450308303321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-280-56050-9
010   $a9786610560509
010   $a0-19-803917-4
010   $a1-4237-2252-3
035   $a(CKB)1000000000245621
035   $a(EBL)271760
035   $a(OCoLC)476008331
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000186690
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11170637
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000186690
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10252699
035   $a(PQKB)10032932
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC271760
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL271760
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10103654
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL56050
035   $a(OCoLC)466426295
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000245621
100   $a20040318d2004      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aJust marriage$b[electronic resource] /$fMary Lyndon Shanley ; edited by Joshua Cohen and Deborah Chasman for Boston Review
210   $aOxford [UK] ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$dc2004
215   $a1 online resource (129 p.)
225 1 $aNew democracy forum/Boston review series
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-19-517626-X 
311   $a0-19-517625-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $tJust marriage : on the public importance of private unions /$rMary Lyndon Shanley --$tThe public stake /$rNancy F. Cott --$tMarriage : love or care? /$rJoan C. Tronto --$tOf federalism and caste /$rCass R. Sunstein --$tWhy marriage? /$rMartha Alberston Fineman --$tMystification, neutrality, and same-sex couples in marriage /$rDavid B. Cruz --$tThe relational case for same-sex marriage /$rWilliam N. Eskridge, Jr. --$tA communitarian position for civil unions /$rAmitai Etzioni --$tBetween justice and commitment /$rMilton C. Regan, Jr. --$tJust monogamy? /$rElizabeth F. Emens --$tThe public supports of love /$rDrucilla Cornell --$tAfter marriage /$rWendy Brown --$tBeyond marriage /$rBrenda Cossman --$tWhy we should disestablish marriage /$rTamara Metz --$tAfterword /$rMary Lyndon Shanley.
330   $aAs the national debate intensifies over what marriage is and who may marry, Mary Lyndon Shanley argues that although the state should continue to play a role in regulating personal relations, the law must be fundamentally reformed if marriage is to become a more just institution.
410  0$aNew democracy forum/Boston review series.
606   $aMarriage$zUnited States
606   $aMarriage$xGovernment policy$zUnited States
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aMarriage
615  0$aMarriage$xGovernment policy
676   $a306.81/0973
700   $aShanley$b Mary Lyndon$f1944-$0922990
701   $aCohen$b Joshua$f1951-$0863413
701   $aChasman$b Deborah$0922991
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910450308303321
996   $aJust marriage$92070998
997   $aUNINA