LEADER 04201oam  2200649I  450 
001 9910450039903321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-280-18276-8
010   $a9786610182763
010   $a1-134-82016-X
010   $a0-203-00649-6
024 7 $a10.4324/9780203006498 
035   $a(CKB)1000000000006919
035   $a(EBL)165376
035   $a(OCoLC)70724429
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000283731
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11228266
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000283731
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10250226
035   $a(PQKB)10601184
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC165376
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL165376
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr5002858
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL18276
035   $a(OCoLC)1000437420
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000006919
100   $a20180331d1995      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aRicardo, the new view /$fSamuel Hollander
210  1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d1995.
215   $a1 online resource (385 p.)
225 1 $aCollected essays ;$v1
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-415-75643-X 
311   $a0-415-11582-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aRICARDO - THE NEW VIEW Collected Essays 1; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; Introduction; Part I. On the interpretation of the early Ricardo; 1. Ricardo's Analysis of the Profit Rate, 1813-15[1973]; 2.Ricardo and the Corn Profit Model:Reply to Eatewell [1975]; 3. Professor Garegnani's Defence of Sraffa on the Material Rate of Profit [1983]; 4. On a 'New Interpretation' of Ricardo's Early Treatment of Profitability [1986]; 5. Sraffa's Rational Reconstruction of Ricardo: On Three Contributions to The Cambridge Journal of Economics [1995]
327   $aPart II. Responses to critics of The Economics of David Ricardo6. The Economics of David Ricardo: A Response to Professor O'brien [1982]; 7. A Reply to Professor Roncaglia [1982]; 8. 'Professor Hollander and Ricardian Economics': A Reply to Processor Moss [1982]; Part III. Ricardian micro-economics; 9. On the Substantive Identity of the Ricardian and Neo-Classical Conceptions of Economic Organization: The French Connection in British Classicism [1982]; 10. Why Marshall was Right About Ricardo [1989]; 11. On Composition Of Demand and Income Distribution in Classical Economics [1989]
327   $a12. On the Endogeneity of the Margin and Related Issues in Ricardian Economics [1991]Part IV. The Ricardian growth model; 13. On the Interpretation of Ricardian Economics the Assumption Regarding Wages [1983]; 14. The Wage Path in Cassical Growth Models: Ricardo, Malthus and Mill [1984]; 15. Ricardian Growth Theory: A Resolution of Some Problems in Textual Interpretation [1990]; 16. A Reply to Processor Stigler and Dr peach [1990]; 17. On the Textual Interpretation of Ricardian Growth Theory: The 'New View' Confirmed (Again) [1994]; Part V. Further intellectual linkages
327   $a18. The Reception of Ricardian Economics [1977]19. The Role of Bentham in the Early Development of Ricardian Theory: A Speculative Essay [1979]; 20. On Professor Samuelson's Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy [1980]; Index
330   $aSamuel Hollander's interpretation of Ricardo has attracted apoplectic responses from both Right and Left. This volume collects together the material needed to evaluate these responses. His basic position - that Ricardo stands in a continuous analytical line leading from Adam Smith to Alfred Marshall - is seen to antagonise both those who argue for a 'marginal revolution' and a sharp divide between classical and neo-classical economics, and those who want to champion Ricardo as a forerunner of Sraffa.
606   $aEconomists$zGreat Britain
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aEconomists
676   $a330.15/3
700   $aHollander$b Samuel.$0119993
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910450039903321
996   $aRicardo, the new view$92234144
997   $aUNINA