LEADER 03215nam  22006372  450 
001 9910449706503321
005 20151005020620.0
010   $a1-107-12468-9
010   $a1-280-42142-8
010   $a0-511-17636-8
010   $a0-511-04193-4
010   $a0-511-15713-4
010   $a0-511-30439-0
010   $a0-511-49551-X
010   $a0-511-04458-5
035   $a(CKB)1000000000008230
035   $a(EBL)202065
035   $a(OCoLC)475916611
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000265374
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11195058
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000265374
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10295332
035   $a(PQKB)11284889
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511495519
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC202065
035   $a(PPN)181319543
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL202065
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10063489
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL42142
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000008230
100   $a20090306d2002||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aUnjustified enrichment $ekey issues in comparative perspective /$fedited by David Johnston and Reinhard Zimmermann$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2002.
215   $a1 online resource (xlii, 749 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-18744-3 
311   $a0-521-80820-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aIntroduction -- Enrichment "without legal ground" or unjust factor approach -- Failure of consideration -- Duress and fraud -- Change of position -- Illegality -- Encroachment and restitution for wrongs -- Improvements -- Discharge of another person's debt -- Third-party enrichment -- Proprietary issues -- Taxonomy.
330   $aUnjustified enrichment has been one of the most intellectually vital areas of private law. There is, however, still no unanimity among civil-law and common-law legal systems about how to structure this important branch of the law of obligations. Several key issues are considered comparatively in this 2002 book, including grounds for recovery of enrichment, defences, third-party enrichment, as well as proprietary and taxonomic questions. Two contributors deal with each topic, one a representative of a common-law system, the other a representative of a civil-law or mixed system. This approach illuminates not just similarities or differences between systems, but also what different systems can learn from one another. In an area of law whose territory is still partially uncharted and whose borders are contested, such comparative perspectives will be valuable for both academic analysis of the law and its development by the courts.
606   $aUnjust enrichment
615  0$aUnjust enrichment.
676   $a346.02/9
702   $aJohnston$b David$f1961-
702   $aZimmermann$b Reinhard$f1952 October 10-
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910449706503321
996   $aUnjustified enrichment$9254106
997   $aUNINA