LEADER 04192nam 22008172 450 001 9910449667403321 005 20151005020624.0 010 $a1-107-13415-3 010 $a1-280-15971-5 010 $a0-511-12074-5 010 $a0-511-04259-0 010 $a0-511-14829-1 010 $a0-511-33026-X 010 $a0-511-48412-7 010 $a0-511-04581-6 035 $a(CKB)1000000000006781 035 $a(EBL)202184 035 $a(OCoLC)56112277 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000235596 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11176156 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000235596 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10249683 035 $a(PQKB)10627726 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511484124 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC202184 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL202184 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10063447 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL15971 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000006781 100 $a20090224d2002|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aReligion, toleration, and British writing, 1790-1830 /$fMark Canuel$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2002. 215 $a1 online resource (vi, 317 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge studies in Romanticism ;$v53 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-02158-8 311 $a0-521-81577-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 302-313) and index. 327 $aRomanticism and the writing of toleration -- "Holy hypocrisy" and the rule of belief: Radcliffe's gothics -- Coleridge's polemic divinity -- Sect and secular economy in the Irish national tale -- Wordsworth and the "frame of social being" -- "Consecrated fancy": Byron and Keats -- Conclusion: the Inquisitorial stage. 330 $aIn Religion, Toleration, and British Writing, 1790-1830, Mark Canuel examines the way that Romantic poets, novelists and political writers criticized the traditional grounding of British political unity in religious conformity. Canuel shows how a wide range of writers including Jeremy Bentham, Ann Radcliffe, Maria Edgeworth and Lord Byron not only undermined the validity of religion in the British state, but also imagined a new, tolerant and more organized mode of social inclusion. To argue against the authority of religion, Canuel claims, was to argue for a thoroughly revised form of tolerant yet highly organized government, in other words, a mode of political authority that provided unprecedented levels of inclusion and protection. Canuel argues that these writers saw their works as political and literary commentaries on the extent and limits of religious toleration. His study throws light on political history as well as the literature of the Romantic period. 410 0$aCambridge studies in Romanticism ;$v53. 517 3 $aReligion, Toleration, & British Writing, 1790-1830 606 $aEnglish literature$y19th century$xHistory and criticism 606 $aReligion and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aReligious tolerance in literature 606 $aReligion and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aReligious tolerance$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aReligious tolerance$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aEnglish literature$y18th century$xHistory and criticism 606 $aRomanticism$zGreat Britain 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aReligion and literature$xHistory 615 0$aReligious tolerance in literature. 615 0$aReligion and literature$xHistory 615 0$aReligious tolerance$xHistory 615 0$aReligious tolerance$xHistory 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aRomanticism 676 $a820.9/382 700 $aCanuel$b Mark$0281575 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910449667403321 996 $aReligion, toleration, and British writing, 1790-1830$9673838 997 $aUNINA