LEADER 04669nam 2200733 a 450 001 9910438358403321 005 20250609110108.0 010 $a1-283-63395-7 010 $a9786613946409 010 $a94-007-4670-9 024 7 $a10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000256410 035 $a(EBL)994363 035 $a(OCoLC)811059044 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000767075 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11399859 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000767075 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10748820 035 $a(PQKB)10079217 035 $a(DE-He213)978-94-007-4670-1 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4975963 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4975963 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL394640 035 $a(OCoLC)1027160662 035 $a(PPN)168338653 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4071826 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000256410 100 $a20120820d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aLegal argumentation theory $ecross-disciplinary perspectives /$fChristian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris, editors 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aNew York $cSpringer$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (238 p.) 225 1 $aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x1572-4395 ;$v102 225 0$aLaw and philosophy library,$x1572-4395 ;$vv. 102 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a94-007-4669-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aTable of Contents -- Introduction; Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris -- Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions; Flavia Carbonell -- On the Argumentum ad Absurdum Statutory Interpretation: its Uses and Normative Significance; Thomas Bustamante -- Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer -- Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav and Lena Wahlberg -- The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis -- Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the ?Unworthy Spouse?; Eveline Feteris -- Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal Norms; Carlos Bernal -- Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression; Bruce Anderson -- Construction or reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law; Jaap Hage -- The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification; Marko Novak -- Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi -- Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann -- Arguing on Facts. Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures.; Giovanni Tuzet -- Index. 330 $aThis book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany. 410 0$aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x1572-4395 ;$v102 606 $aLaw$xMethodology 606 $aLogic 606 $aReasoning 606 $aTrial practice 615 0$aLaw$xMethodology. 615 0$aLogic. 615 0$aReasoning. 615 0$aTrial practice. 676 $a340.11 701 $aDahlman$b Christian$01059169 701 $aFeteris$b Eveline$01059170 712 12$aWorld Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy$d(25th :$f2011 :$eFrankfurt am Main, Germany) 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910438358403321 996 $aLegal argumentation theory$92504467 997 $aUNINA