LEADER 03225nam  2200625Ia 450 
001 9910438358103321
005 20250609110829.0
010   $a1-283-63385-X
010   $a9786613946300
010   $a94-007-4599-0
024 7 $a10.1007/978-94-007-4599-5
035   $a(CKB)2670000000256375
035   $a(EBL)994345
035   $a(OCoLC)808468455
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000737003
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11455680
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000737003
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10789663
035   $a(PQKB)10129908
035   $a(DE-He213)978-94-007-4599-5
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC994345
035   $a(PPN)168338467
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4072222
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000256375
100   $a20120909h20122013  uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aDebate dynamics $ehow controversy improves our beliefs /$fGregor Betz
205   $a1st ed. 2013.
210   $aDordrecht ;$aNew York $cSpringer$d2012, c2013
215   $a1 online resource (253 p.)
225 1 $aSynthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,$x0166-6991 ;$v357
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a94-017-8426-4 
311 08$a94-007-4598-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $a1. General Introduction -- 2. Theory of Dialectical Structures -- Part I: Why Do We Agree? On the Consensus-conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation -- 3. Introduction to Part I.- 4. Random Debates -- 5. Background Knowledge -- 6. Four Argumentation Strategies -- 7. Argumentation Strategies in Many-proponent Debates -- 8. Core Updating -- 9. Core Argumentation -- Part II: How Do We Know? On the Truth-conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation -- 10. Introduction to Part II -- 11. Random Debates -- 12. Background Knowledge -- 13. Four Argumentation Strategies -- 14. Argumentation Strategies in Many-proponent Debates -- 15. Core Updating -- 16. Core Argumentation -- Symbols -- References -- Index.
330   $aIs critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth- and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates. The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory. Besides its consequences for discursive practice, the work may have important implications for philosophy of science and the way we construe scientific rationality, as well.
410  0$aSynthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,$x0166-6991 ;$v357
606   $aDebates and debating
606   $aDiscussion
615  0$aDebates and debating.
615  0$aDiscussion.
676   $a168
700   $aBetz$b Gregor$0518069
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910438358103321
996   $aDebate dynamics$94191998
997   $aUNINA