LEADER 03429nam  2200685 a 450 
001 9910438234103321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-93602-X
010   $a94-007-5240-7
024 7 $a10.1007/978-94-007-5240-5
035   $a(CKB)2670000000318018
035   $a(EBL)1083537
035   $a(OCoLC)823388594
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000879640
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11477747
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000879640
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10853928
035   $a(PQKB)11000729
035   $a(DE-He213)978-94-007-5240-5
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1083537
035   $a(PPN)168340356
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000318018
100   $a20120824d2013      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aRenaissance averroism and its aftermath $eArabic philosophy in early modern Europe /$fAnna Akasoy, Guido Giglioni, editors
205   $a1st ed. 2013.
210   $aNew York $cSpringer$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (399 p.)
225 1 $aArchives internationales d'histoire des idees =$aInternational archives of the history of ideas,$x0066-6610 ;$v211
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a94-017-8102-8 
311   $a94-007-5239-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $apt. I. Middle Ages and Renaissance -- pt. II. The early modern period -- pt. III. Averroism and modernity.
330   $aWhile the transmission of Greek philosophy and science via the Muslim world to western Europe in the Middle Ages has been closely scrutinized, the fate of the Arabic philosophical and scientific legacy in later centuries has received less attention, a fault this volume aims to correct. The authors in this collection discuss in particular the radical ideas associated with Averroism that are attributed to the Aristotle commentator Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and challenge key doctrines of the Abrahamic religions. This volume examines what happened to Averroes?s philosophy during the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Did early modern thinkers really no longer pay any attention to the Commentator? Were there undercurrents of Averroism after the sixteenth century? How did Western authors in this period contextualise Averroes and Arabic philosophy within their own cultural heritage? How different was the Averroes they created as a philosopher in a European tradition from Ibn Rushd, the theologian, jurist and philosopher of the Islamic tradition?
410  0$aArchives internationales d'histoire des idees ;$v211.
606   $aPhilosophy, Arab
606   $aPhilosophy, Medieval$xIslamic influences
606   $aPhilosophy, European$xHistory
607   $aEurope$xIntellectual life$y16th century
607   $aEurope$xIntellectual life$y17th century
607   $aEurope$xIntellectual life$y18th century
615  0$aPhilosophy, Arab.
615  0$aPhilosophy, Medieval$xIslamic influences.
615  0$aPhilosophy, European$xHistory.
676   $a181.92
701   $aAkasoy$b Anna$0933898
701   $aGiglioni$b Guido$0256099
712 02$aWarburg Institute.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910438234103321
996   $aRenaissance averroism and its aftermath$94197237
997   $aUNINA