LEADER 03041nam  2200649 a 450 
001 9910438227703321
005 20251116201743.0
010   $a1-283-94603-3
010   $a94-007-5348-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-94-007-5348-8
035   $a(CKB)2670000000317996
035   $a(EBL)1030681
035   $a(OCoLC)824455188
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000878873
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11543426
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000878873
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10836504
035   $a(PQKB)11745262
035   $a(DE-He213)978-94-007-5348-8
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1030681
035   $a(PPN)168340658
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000317996
100   $a20121120d2013      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aExclusionary rules in comparative law /$fStephen C.Thaman, editor
205   $a1st ed. 2013.
210   $aDordrecht $cSpringer$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (460 p.)
225 1 $aIus gentium ;$vv. 20
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a94-007-9849-0 
311 08$a94-007-5347-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $apt. 1. The vicissitudes of court-made exclusionary tests -- pt. 2. From nullities to statutory exclusionary rules in continental Europe -- pt. 3. The fair trial test for exclusion -- pt. 4. A comparison of exclusionary jurisprudence.
330   $aThis book is a comparative study of the exclusion of illegally gathered evidence in the criminal trial , which includes 15 country studies, a chapter on the European Court of Human Rights, and a comparative synthetic conclusion.  No other book has undertaken such a broad comparative study of exclusionary rules, which have now become a  world-wide phenomenon. The topic is one of the most controversial in criminal procedure law, because it reveals a constant tension between the criminal court?s duty  to ascertain the truth, on the one hand, and its duty to uphold important constitutional rights on the other,  most importantly, the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to privacy in one's home and one's private communications.  The chapters were contributed by noted world experts on the subject for the XVIII Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law in Washington in July 2010.
410  0$aIus gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ;$vv. 20.
606   $aExclusionary rule (Evidence)
606   $aEvidence (Law)
606   $aComparative law
615  0$aExclusionary rule (Evidence)
615  0$aEvidence (Law)
615  0$aComparative law.
676   $a340.2
676   $a345.062
701   $aThaman$b Stephen$f1946-$01234311
712 12$aInternational Congress of Comparative Law.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910438227703321
996   $aExclusionary rules in comparative law$94187080
997   $aUNINA