LEADER 03511nam  22006495  450 
001 9910438227403321
005 20230810210541.0
010   $a1-283-93516-3
010   $a3-642-32659-5
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-642-32659-2
035   $a(CKB)2670000000317359
035   $a(EBL)1082585
035   $a(OCoLC)823736309
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000870771
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11463463
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000870771
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10818996
035   $a(PQKB)10161881
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-642-32659-2
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1082585
035   $a(PPN)168322382
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000317359
100   $a20121214d2013      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aRethinking Natural Law /$fby Paulo Ferreira da Cunha
205   $a1st ed. 2013.
210  1$aBerlin, Heidelberg :$cSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :$cImprint: Springer,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (78 p.)
225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Law,$x2192-8568
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-642-32658-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aIntroduction. Part I  Foundations: Goethe's Swan -- The contributions of the paradigm "Natural Law" -- Sterility of Natural Law theoricism -- From the side of positivism -- Part II New Visions Old Questions: Contemporary Natural Law dialogues -- What Natural Law is, what it is not -- Legacies and achievements of Iusnaturalism -- Avatars of Natural Law. Natural Law in different colours -- Conclusion.
330   $aFor centuries, natural law was the main philosophical legal paradigm. Now, it is a wonder when a court of law invokes it. Arthur Kaufmann already underlined a modern general "horror iuris naturalis". We also know, with Winfried Hassemer, that the succession of legal paradigms is a matter of fashion. But why did natural law become outdated? Are there any remnants of it still alive today? This book analyses a number of prejudices and myths that have created a general misconception of natural law. As Jean-Marc Trigeaud put it: there is a natural law that positivists invented. Not the real one(s). It seeks to understand not only the usual adversaries of natural law (like legalists, positivists and historicists) but also its further enemies, the inner enemies of natural law, such as internal aporias, political and ideological manipulations, etc. The book puts forward a reasoned and balanced examination of this treasure of western political and juridical though. And, if we look at it another way, natural law is by no means a loser in our times: because it lives in modern human rights.
410  0$aSpringerBriefs in Law,$x2192-8568
606   $aLaw$xPhilosophy
606   $aLaw$xHistory
606   $aPolitical science
606   $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
606   $aPhilosophy of Law
606   $aPolitical Theory
615  0$aLaw$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aLaw$xHistory.
615  0$aPolitical science.
615 14$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Law.
615 24$aPolitical Theory.
676   $a340.112
700   $aFerreira da Cunha$b Paulo$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01064445
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910438227403321
996   $aRethinking Natural Law$92538330
997   $aUNINA