LEADER 03929nam 22006855 450 001 9910438061503321 005 20260810115956.0 010 $a1-283-61232-1 010 $a9786613924773 010 $a94-007-4593-1 024 7 $a10.1007/978-94-007-4593-3 035 $a(CKB)2670000000256407 035 $a(EBL)972034 035 $a(OCoLC)811059045 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000753521 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11433587 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000753521 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10813716 035 $a(PQKB)10124779 035 $a(DE-He213)978-94-007-4593-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC972034 035 $a(PPN)168338440 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4072221 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000256407 100 $a20120914d2013 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe Planning Theory of Law $eA Critical Reading /$fedited by Damiano Canale, Giovanni Tuzet 205 $a1st ed. 2013. 210 1$aDordrecht :$cSpringer Netherlands :$cImprint: Springer,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (220 p.) 225 1 $aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x2215-0315 ;$v100 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a94-017-8394-2 311 08$a94-007-4592-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a100th edition announcement -- Authors Biographies -- Introduction; Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet -- 1. Looking for the Nature of Law: On Shapiro’s Challenge; Damiano Canale -- 2. The Possibility Puzzle and Legal Positivism; Francesca Poggi -- 3. What is Wrong with Legal Realism?; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. Rule of Recognition, Convention and Obligation. What Shapiro Can Still Learn from Hart’s Mistakes; Aldo Schiavello -- 5. Legality: Between Purposes and Functions; Diego Papayannis -- 6. What Can Plans Do for Legal Theory?; Bruno Celano -- 7. Ruling Platitudes, Old Metaphysics, and a Few Misunderstandings about Legal Positivism.; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 8. Theoretical Disagreements. A Restatement of Legal Positivism; Jordi Ferrer and Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 9. ‘What’s the Plan?’ On Interpretation and Meta-interpretation in Scott Shapiro’s Legality; Giorgio Pino. 330 $aThis collection of essays is the outcome of a workshop with Scott Shapiro on The Planning Theory of Law that took place in December 2009 at Bocconi University. It brings together a group of scholars who wrote their contributions to the workshop on a preliminary draft of Shapiro’s Legality. Then, after the workshop, they wrote their final essays on the published version of the book. The contributions clearly highlight the difference of the continental and civil law perspective from the common law background of Shapiro but at the same time the volume tries to bridge the gap between the two. The essays provide a critical reading of the planning theory of law, highlighting its merits on the one hand and objecting to some parts of it on the other hand. Each contribution discusses in detail a chapter of Shapiro’s book and together they cover the whole of Shapiro’s theory. So the book presents a balanced and insightful discussion of the arguments of Legality. 410 0$aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x2215-0315 ;$v100 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 606 $aPhilosophy of Law 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 14$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Law. 676 $a340 701 $aCanale$b Damiano$0269000 701 $aTuzet$b Giovanni$0502149 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910438061503321 996 $aThe planning theory of law$94187492 997 $aUNINA