LEADER 03375nam 2200517Ia 450 001 9910438060603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a3-319-00134-5 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-00134-0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000388641 035 $a(EBL)1317451 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000935586 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11597491 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000935586 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10952928 035 $a(PQKB)10657500 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-00134-0 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1317451 035 $a(PPN)170489396 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000388641 100 $a20111102d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aCourts' inquiry into arbitral jurisdiction at the pre-award stage $ea comparative analysis of the English, German and Swiss legal order /$fSandra Synkova 210 $aCham $cSpringer$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (320 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-319-00133-7 327 $aIntroduction -- Functional Equivalents for Comparison -- Theoretical Underpinnings of Arbitral Jurisdiction -- Competence-Competence -- The New York Convention and the Obligation to Recognise and Enforce Arbitration Agreements -- The Application of Section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (England) -- The Application of § 1032(1) of the German Code of Civil Procedure (Germany) -- The Application of Article 7 of the Swiss Private International Law Act (Switzerland) -- Conclusion, Evaluation and Future Perspectives. 330 $aInternational arbitration has become the favored method of resolving disputes between business partners in almost every aspect of international trade, commerce, and investment. The resolution of a dispute by means of international arbitration provides the parties with an opportunity to resolve their disputes in a private, confidential, cost and time efficient manner before a neutral tribunal of their choice. However, challenges to arbitral jurisdiction have become a common practice in the field. Resolution of such challenges may significantly delay the resolution of the parties? primary substantive dispute, increase overall dispute resolution costs and even whittle down the benefits of the parties? bargain to arbitrate. Accordingly, adopting a proper approach to the resolution of such disputes becomes crucial to the efficacy of international arbitration as a system of dispute resolution. The present book provides a comparative analysis of the practice of three carefully selected legal orders: the English, German and Swiss and outlines possible ways forward. As the work strikes a balance between theory and practice, it will appeal to practitioners, researchers, but also students looking to develop their understanding of the international arbitration field. 606 $aArbitration and award 606 $aArbitration (International law) 615 0$aArbitration and award. 615 0$aArbitration (International law) 676 $a347.409 700 $aSynkova$b Sandra$01058803 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910438060603321 996 $aCourts' inquiry into arbitral jurisdiction at the pre-award stage$92502530 997 $aUNINA