LEADER 03700oam  2200505   450 
001 9910424636003321
005 20210529221949.0
010   $a3-030-56134-8
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5
035   $a(CKB)5590000000005353
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6419841
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-56134-5
035   $a(EXLCZ)995590000000005353
100   $a20210529d2020      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aDoes neuroscience have normative implications? /$fedited by Geoffrey S. Holtzman, Elisabeth Hildt
205   $a1st ed. 2020.
210  1$aCham, Switzerland :$cSpringer,$d[2020]
210  4$d©2020
215   $a1 online resource (XV, 211 p. 1 illus.) 
225 1 $aThe International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology,$x1875-0044 ;$v22
311   $a3-030-56133-X 
327   $a1. The Neuroscience of Human Morality: Three Levels of Normative Implications (Jon Leefmann) -- 2. Moral Responsibility and Perceived Threats from Neuroscience (Myrto Mylopoulos) -- 3. Lessons for Ethics from the Science of Pain (Jennifer Corns and Robert Cowan) -- 4. Two Theories of Moral Cognition (Julia Haas) -- 5. Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism (Chris Zarpentine) -- 6. The Reactive Roots of Retribution: Normative Implications of the Neuroscience of Punishment (Isaac Wiegman) -- 7. Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology ? Intended and Perceived (Ullica Segerstrale) -- 8. Nervous Norms (Matthew Ruble) -- 9. Neuromodulation of the ?Moral Brain? ? Evaluating Bridges Between Neural Foundations of Moral Capacities and Normative Aims of the Intervention (Christian Ineichen and Markus Christen) -- 10. Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics (Bongrae Seok).
330   $aThis book brings together a number of essays that are optimistic about the ways certain neuroscientific insights might advance philosophical ethics, and other essays that are more circumspect about the relevance of neuroscience to philosophical ethics. As a whole, the essays form a self-reflective body of work that simultaneously seeks to derive normative ethical implications from neuroscience, and to question whether and how that may be possible at all. In doing so, the collection brings together psychology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, ethics, and philosophy of science. Neuroscience seeks to understand the biological systems that guide human behavior and cognition. Normative ethics, on the other hand, seeks to understand the system of abstract moral principles dictating how people ought to behave. By studying how the human brain makes moral judgments, can philosophers learn anything about the nature of morality itself? A growing number of researchers believe that neuroscience can, indeed, provide insights into the questions of philosophical ethics. However, even these advocates acknowledge that the path from neuroscientific is to normative ethical ought can be quite fraught. .
410  0$aThe International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology,$x1875-0044 ;$v22
606   $aBioethics
606   $aNeurosciences
606   $aMoral Philosophy65
615  0$aBioethics.
615  0$aNeurosciences.
615  0$aMoral Philosophy65.
676   $a174.2928
702   $aHildt$b Elisabeth
702   $aHoltzman$b Geoffrey S.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bUtOrBLW
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910424636003321
996   $aDoes neuroscience have normative implications$92018947
997   $aUNINA