LEADER 00914nam0-22003251i-450- 001 990000772240403321 005 20151203092943.0 010 $a8832458233 035 $a000077224 035 $aFED01000077224 035 $a(Aleph)000077224FED01 035 $a000077224 100 $a20020821d1987----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay---a---001yy 200 1 $aTutela dell'ambiente naturale$edifesa, gestione e sviluppo della natura e del paesaggio$fMario Di Fidio 205 $a2. ed 210 $aMilano$cPirola editore$d1987 215 $a418 p.$d24 cm 700 1$aDi Fidio,$bMario$09602 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990000772240403321 952 $aURB.LE B 664$bINV.1195$fFARBC 952 $aLAN 119$b322/2015$fDARPU 959 $aFARBC 959 $aDARPU 996 $aTutela dell'ambiente naturale$9349962 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01166nam a2200277 i 4500 001 991002182459707536 005 20020508191853.0 008 960716s1966 uk ||| | eng 020 $a0208016155 035 $ab1097135x-39ule_inst 035 $aPARLA156852$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Scienze dell'Antichità$bita 100 1 $aGeanakoplos, Deno John$0187911 245 10$aByzantine East and Latin West :$btwo worlds of Christendom in Middle Ages and Renaissance :$bstudies in ecclesiastical and cultural history /$cDeno J. Geanakoplos 260 $aOxford :$bBlackwell,$c1966 300 $aXII, 206 p., [8] p. di tav. :$bill. ;$c23 cm 500 $aBibliografia: p. [194]-200. Indici 611 24$aConcilio di Firenze$d<1438-1445> 650 4$aImpero bizantino$xRelazioni$zEuropa 650 4$aScisma$xChiesa Orientale e Occidentale 907 $a.b1097135x$b02-04-14$c28-06-02 912 $a991002182459707536 945 $aLE007 270 GEA 01.01$g1$i2015000086235$lle007$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i11082112$z28-06-02 996 $aByzantine East and Latin West$9864375 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale007$b01-01-96$cm$da $e-$feng$guk $h0$i1 LEADER 04332nam 22006495 450 001 9910422643703321 005 20250505000152.0 010 $a3-030-45684-6 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9 035 $a(CKB)4100000011457854 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6352842 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-45684-9 035 $a(PPN)250221403 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011457854 100 $a20200917d2020 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPermanent Investment Courts $eThe European Experiment /$fedited by Güne? Ünüvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan 205 $a1st ed. 2020. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource (IX, 150 p. 1 illus.) 225 1 $aSpecial Issue,$x2510-6899 311 0 $a3-030-45683-8 311 0 $a978-3-030-45683-2 327 $aShai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Güne? Ünüvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges. . 330 $aThis special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of theUNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions. 410 0$aSpecial Issue,$x2510-6899 606 $aInternational law 606 $aTrade regulation 606 $aCommercial law 606 $aEuropean Economic Community 606 $aEurope$xPolitics and government 606 $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law 606 $aEuropean Economic Law 606 $aEuropean Politics 615 0$aInternational law. 615 0$aTrade regulation. 615 0$aCommercial law. 615 0$aEuropean Economic Community. 615 0$aEurope$xPolitics and government. 615 14$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law. 615 24$aEuropean Economic Law. 615 24$aEuropean Politics. 676 $a346.40922 702 $aDothan$b Shai 702 $aLam$b Joanna 702 $aU?nu?var$b Gu?nes? 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910422643703321 996 $aPermanent investment courts$92036183 997 $aUNINA