LEADER 03772nam 22005655 450 001 9910420930303321 005 20200714012926.0 010 $a3-030-45012-0 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-45012-0 035 $a(CKB)4100000011343449 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6273325 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-45012-0 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011343449 100 $a20200713d2020 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aIslamic Disputation Theory $eThe Uses & Rules of Argument in Medieval Islam /$fby Larry Benjamin Miller 205 $a1st ed. 2020. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource (xviii, 143 pages) 225 1 $aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,$x2214-9120 ;$v21 311 $a3-030-45011-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. Theological Dialectic (Jadal) -- 2. Dialectic and Arabic Philosophy -- 3. Dialectic (Jadal) in Jurisprudence -- 4. The ?d?b Al-Ba?th. 330 $aThis book charts the evolution of Islamic dialectical theory (jadal) over a four-hundred year period. It includes an extensive study of the development of methods of disputation in Islamic theology (kal?m) and jurisprudence (u??l al-fiqh) from the tenth through the fourteenth centuries. The author uses the theoretical writings of Islamic theologians, jurists, and philosophers to describe the concept Overall, this investigation looks at the extent to which the development of Islamic modes of disputation is rooted in Aristotle and the classical tradition. The author reconstructs the contents of the earliest systematic treatment of the subject by b. al-R?wand?. He then contrasts the theological understanding of dialectic with the teachings of the Arab Aristotelians?al-F?r?b?, Avicenna, and Averroes. Next, the monograph shows how jurists took over the theological method of dialectic and applied it to problems peculiar to jurisprudence. Although the earliest writings on dialectic are fairly free of direct Aristotelian influence, there are coincidences of themes and treatment. But after jurisprudence had assimilated the techniques of theological dialectic, its own theory became increasingly influenced by logical terminology and techniques. At the end of the thirteenth century there arose a new discipline, the ?d?b al-ba?th. While the theoretical underpinnings of the new system are Aristotelian, the terminology and order of debate place it firmly in the Islamic tradition of disputation. 410 0$aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,$x2214-9120 ;$v21 606 $aMedieval philosophy 606 $aLaw 606 $aPhilology 606 $aMedieval Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E17000 606 $aLaw, general$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R00001 606 $aClassical Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/728000 615 0$aMedieval philosophy. 615 0$aLaw. 615 0$aPhilology. 615 14$aMedieval Philosophy. 615 24$aLaw, general. 615 24$aClassical Studies. 676 $a297.209 700 $aMiller$b Larry Benjamin$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0926054 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910420930303321 996 $aIslamic Disputation Theory$92079124 997 $aUNINA