LEADER 03534nam  22006615  450 
001 9910420929403321
005 20250610110538.0
010   $a9783030495091
010   $a3030495094
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-49509-1
035   $a(CKB)4100000011354664
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6273749
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-49509-1
035   $a(Perlego)3481640
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6270888
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC29091093
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000011354664
100   $a20200717d2020      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aAnimals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason /$fby Federico Zuolo
205   $a1st ed. 2020.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2020.
215   $a1 online resource (287 pages) $cillustrations
300   $aIncludes index.
311 08$a9783030495084 
311 08$a3030495086 
327   $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Animal Treatment as a Matter of Reasonable Disagreement -- Chapter 3. Public Justification and the Disagreement on Animals -- Chapter 4. Views on the Moral Status of Animals -- Chapter 5. Applying Public Justification: Interests, Principles, and Competing Reasons -- Chapter 6. Addressing Unlawfulness: Admissible and Non-Admissible Forms of Protest -- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
330   $aThis book explores the problem of disagreement concerning the treatment of animals in a liberal society. Current laws include an unprecedented concern for animal welfare, yet disagreement remains pervasive. This issue has so far been neglected both in political philosophy and animal ethics. Although starting from disagreement has been the hallmark of many politically liberal theories, none have been devoted to the treatment of animals, and conversely, most theories in animal ethics do not take the disagreement on this issue seriously. Bridging this divide with a change of perspective, Zuolo argues that we should begin from the disagreement on the moral status of animals and the treatment we owe them. Reconstructing the epistemic nature of disagreement about animals, Zuolo proposes a novel form of public justification to find principles acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved.
606   $aEthics
606   $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy
606   $aKnowledge, Theory of
606   $aAnimal welfare$xMoral and ethical aspects
606   $aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics
606   $aPolitical Philosophy
606   $aEpistemology
606   $aAnimal Ethics
615  0$aEthics.
615  0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aKnowledge, Theory of.
615  0$aAnimal welfare$xMoral and ethical aspects.
615 14$aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
615 24$aPolitical Philosophy.
615 24$aEpistemology.
615 24$aAnimal Ethics.
676   $a179.3
676   $a100
700   $aZuolo$b Federico$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0607641
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910420929403321
996   $aAnimals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason$92195609
997   $aUNINA