LEADER 03563nam 22006015 450 001 9910420929403321 005 20200717114038.0 010 $a3-030-49509-4 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-49509-1 035 $a(CKB)4100000011354664 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6273749 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-49509-1 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011354664 100 $a20200717d2020 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAnimals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason /$fby Federico Zuolo 205 $a1st ed. 2020. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource (287 pages) $cillustrations 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a3-030-49508-6 327 $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Animal Treatment as a Matter of Reasonable Disagreement -- Chapter 3. Public Justification and the Disagreement on Animals -- Chapter 4. Views on the Moral Status of Animals -- Chapter 5. Applying Public Justification: Interests, Principles, and Competing Reasons -- Chapter 6. Addressing Unlawfulness: Admissible and Non-Admissible Forms of Protest -- Chapter 7. Conclusion. 330 $aThis book explores the problem of disagreement concerning the treatment of animals in a liberal society. Current laws include an unprecedented concern for animal welfare, yet disagreement remains pervasive. This issue has so far been neglected both in political philosophy and animal ethics. Although starting from disagreement has been the hallmark of many politically liberal theories, none have been devoted to the treatment of animals, and conversely, most theories in animal ethics do not take the disagreement on this issue seriously. Bridging this divide with a change of perspective, Zuolo argues that we should begin from the disagreement on the moral status of animals and the treatment we owe them. Reconstructing the epistemic nature of disagreement about animals, Zuolo proposes a novel form of public justification to find principles acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved. 606 $aEthics 606 $aPolitical philosophy 606 $aEpistemology 606 $aAnimal welfare 606 $aEthics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14000 606 $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000 606 $aEpistemology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E13000 606 $aAnimal Welfare/Animal Ethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H67010 615 0$aEthics. 615 0$aPolitical philosophy. 615 0$aEpistemology. 615 0$aAnimal welfare. 615 14$aEthics. 615 24$aPolitical Philosophy. 615 24$aEpistemology. 615 24$aAnimal Welfare/Animal Ethics. 676 $a179.3 676 $a100 700 $aZuolo$b Federico$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0607641 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910420929403321 996 $aAnimals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason$92195609 997 $aUNINA