LEADER 03503nam 2200445 450 001 9910413450903321 005 20230328120202.0 035 $a(CKB)4100000011401316 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/60892 035 $a(NjHacI)994100000011401316 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011401316 100 $a20230328d2015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aThinking methods in media and religion $eNatalie Fritz [and eight others] 210 1$aMarburg :$cSchu?ren Verlag,$d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 electronic resource (106 p.) 225 1 $aJournal for Religion, Film and Media 311 $a3-7410-0005-1 327 $aEditorial 9 -- I Religion, Media and Communication -- Religion and Communication Spaces 23 -- A Semio-pragmatic Approach -- Documentary Media and Religious Communities 31 -- Methodological Challenges by (New) Media 37 -- An Essay on Perspectives and Possible Consequences -- II Religion, Media and Gender -- (Re)Making a Difference 45 -- Religion, Mediatisation and Gender -- Staging the Dead 57 -- The Material Body as a Medium for Gender and Religion -- Mediality and Materiality in the History of Religions 65 -- A Medieval Case Study about Religion and Gender in In-Between Spaces. 330 $aInspired by a workshop held at the University of Zurich in November 2014, we inaugurate the Journal for Religion, Film and Media (JRFM) with a special issue dedicated to methodology. The field of media and religion is characterised by a multitude of approaches to both religion and media. The choice of communication paradigms and analytical procedures to be used in an investigation of the intertwined relationship of religion and media depends on the sources, the questions we seek to answer and the cultural context. This issue of JRFM presents a range of methodological procedures by highlighting three selected communication models: the first part considers a model that defines communication as an overlap of spaces that mediates meaning-making processes; the second part looks at the employment of a gender lens for investigation of the relationship between media and religion; the final part analyses the interaction between media and religion in the context of various contemporary art productions. While these models have been drawn from a broad range of possible topics, those selected share a common concern: they involve reflection on methodological steps used to analyse interactions always characterised by non-linear and multi-causal relations. Each of the three main sections contains a key article and two responses, with the methodological questions addressed by invited contributors commented upon, discussed critically and developed further by members of the mentioned research groups. 517 $aMethodological Challenges by 517 $aEditorial 517 $aCross-media Transmission Processes 517 $aReligion, Belief and Medial Layering of Communication 517 $aApproaching Religious Symbols in the Public Space 606 $aMass Media$xReligious Aspects 615 0$aMass Media$xReligious Aspects. 676 $a201.7 700 $aFritz$b Natalie$01347970 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910413450903321 996 $aThinking methods in media and religion$93084988 997 $aUNINA