LEADER 02292nam  2200409z- 450 
001 9910404219503321
005 20210211
010   $a989-26-1691-X
035   $a(CKB)4100000011302736
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/56436
035   $a(oapen)doab56436
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000011302736
100   $a20202102d2019      |y         0
101 0 $apor
135   $aurmn|---annan
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aPlutarco. Sobre comer carne
210   $cCoimbra University Press$d2019
215   $a1 online resource (54 p.)
225 1 $aClassica Digitalia: Diaita: Scripta & Realia - Estudos Monográficos
311 08$a989-26-1690-1 
330   $aThe treatise De esu carnium (On eating of flesh) came to us in the form of two logoi, with multiple lacunae, especially in the second logos. By recovering themes already developed by the Pythagorean doctrine, by Xenocrates, by Theophrastus or by the Stoics, Plutarch argues about the nature of living beings, within the scope of the relationship between man and animal. Like other treatises of the corpus plutarcheum, such as Bruta animalia ratione uti (The animals are rational), better known as Gryllus, or De sollertia animalium (On the intelligence of animals), the narrative is developed around questions related to the nature and psychology of animals, such as the possibility that virtue and reason exist in them. Plutarch defends the philanthropy and the generosity with which all living beings should be treated, thus opposing simple utilitarianism or the problematic principle of necessity. Being one of the zoological treatises, De esu carnium is also a rhetorical text, because Plutarch constructs, in opposition to the Stoics, an argumentative theory that supports the idea that eating meat is ????? ?????? ('against nature').
610   $aAnimal
610   $aDe esu carnium
610   $aDiaita
610   $aFood history
610   $aHuman condition
610   $aPhysis
610   $aPlutarch
610   $aRhetoric
700   $aJoaquim Pinheiro$4auth$01325399
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910404219503321
996   $aPlutarco. Sobre comer carne$93036848
997   $aUNINA