LEADER 03606oam 22005294a 450 001 9910404131903321 005 20230621140529.0 035 $a(CKB)4100000011302000 035 $a(OCoLC)1154785935 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse85645 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43805 035 $a(oapen)doab43805 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011302000 100 $a20200518e20202019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|||||||nn|n 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aConflict and Cultural Heritage$eA Moral Analysis of the Challenges of Heritage Protection /$fHelen Frowe and Derek Matravers 210 $cGetty Publications$d2019 210 1$aBaltimore, Maryland :$cProject Muse,$d2020 210 4$dİ2020 215 $a1 online resource (1 EPUB unpaged.) 225 0 $aJ. Paul Getty Trust occasional papers in cultural heritage policy ;$vnumber 3 311 08$a1-60606-640-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aIn the third issue of the J. Paul Getty Trust Occasional Papers in Cultural Heritage Policy series, authors Helen Frowe and Derek Matravers pivot from the earlier tone of the series in discussing the appropriate response to attacks on cultural heritage with their paper, "Conflict and Cultural Heritage: A Moral Analysis of the Challenges of Heritage Protection." While Frowe and Matravers acknowledge the importance of cultural heritage, they assert that we must more carefully consider the complex moral dimensions--the inevitable serious consequences to human beings--before formulating policy to forcefully protect it. A number of writers and thinkers working on the problem of preserving the world's most treasured monuments, sites, and objects today cite what Frowe and Matravers call extrinsic and intrinsic justifications for the protection of cultural heritage. These are arguments that maintain that protecting heritage will be a key means to achieve other important goals, like the prevention of genocide, or arguments that heritage deserves to be forcefully protected for its own sake. Frowe and Matravers deconstruct both types of justifications, demonstrating a lack of clear evidence for a causal relationship between the destruction of cultural heritage and atrocities like genocide and arguing that the defense of heritage must not be treated with the same weight or urgency, or according to the same international policies, as the defense of human lives. By calling for expanded theory and empirical data and the consideration of morality in the crafting of international policy vis-a?-vis cultural heritage protection, Frowe and Matravers present a thoughtful critique that enriches this important series and adds to the ongoing dialogue in the field. 410 0$aJ. Paul Getty Trust occasional papers in cultural heritage policy ;$vno.3. 606 $aArt and war 606 $aArchitecture$xConservation and restoration 606 $aArt$xConservation and restoration 606 $aCultural property$xProtection 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aArt and war. 615 0$aArchitecture$xConservation and restoration. 615 0$aArt$xConservation and restoration. 615 0$aCultural property$xProtection. 700 $aFrowe$b Helen$01022645 702 $aMatravers$b Derek 712 02$aJ. Paul Getty Trust, 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910404131903321 996 $aConflict and Cultural Heritage$92429215 997 $aUNINA