LEADER 04036nam  22006735  450 
001 9910392730703321
005 20200630230348.0
010   $a1-137-49823-4
024 7 $a10.1057/978-1-137-49823-6
035   $a(CKB)3710000000777397
035   $a(EBL)4716279
035   $a(DE-He213)978-1-137-49823-6
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4716279
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000777397
100   $a20160804d2016      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aWittgenstein and Interreligious Disagreement $eA Philosophical and Theological Perspective /$fby Gorazd Andrej?
205   $a1st ed. 2016.
210  1$aNew York :$cPalgrave Macmillan US :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (290 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-137-50307-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
327   $a Introduction -- 1. Wittgenstein on Religion: The Four Conceptions  -- 2. George Lindbeck, Wittgenstein and Grammar of Interreligious Disagreement -- 3. Incommensurability and Interreligious Communication -- 4. David Tracy, Experience, and ?Similarities-in-Difference? -- 5. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Interreligious Disagreements: Descriptive and Normative Investigations -- Bibliography.
330   $a This book critically examines three distinct interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, those of George Lindbeck, David Tracy, and David Burrell, while paying special attention to the topic of interreligious disagreement. In theological and philosophical work on interreligious communication, Ludwig Wittgenstein has been interpreted in very different, sometimes contradicting ways. This is partly due to the nature of Wittgenstein?s philosophy, which is not composed of a theory but several, varying conceptions of religion. In this volume, Gorazd Andrej? illustrates how assorted uptakes of Wittgenstein?s conceptions of religion, and the differing theological perspectives of the authors who formulated them, shape interpretations of interreligious disagreement and dialogue. Inspired by selected perspectives from Tillichian philosophical theology, this book suggests a new way of engaging both descriptive and normative aspects of Wittgenstein?s conceptions of religion in the interpretation of interreligious disagreement. .
606   $aChristianity
606   $aReligion?Philosophy
606   $aReligion
606   $aReligions
606   $aTheology
606   $aLanguage and languages?Philosophy
606   $aChristianity$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1A3000
606   $aPhilosophy of Religion$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E33000
606   $aReligious Studies, general$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1A0000
606   $aComparative Religion$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1A1000
606   $aChristian Theology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1A3150
606   $aPhilosophy of Language$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E26000
615  0$aChristianity.
615  0$aReligion?Philosophy.
615  0$aReligion.
615  0$aReligions.
615  0$aTheology.
615  0$aLanguage and languages?Philosophy.
615 14$aChristianity.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Religion.
615 24$aReligious Studies, general.
615 24$aComparative Religion.
615 24$aChristian Theology.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Language.
676   $a210.1
700   $aAndrej?$b Gorazd$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01057873
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910392730703321
996   $aWittgenstein and Interreligious Disagreement$92495350
997   $aUNINA