LEADER 03643nam  22005535  450 
001 9910390860103321
005 20200706011752.0
010   $a3-030-42905-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-42905-8
035   $a(CKB)4100000010660956
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6133714
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-42905-8
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000010660956
100   $a20200311d2020      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aCassirer?s Transformation: From a Transcendental to a Semiotic Philosophy of Forms$b[electronic resource] /$fby Jean Lassègue
205   $a1st ed. 2020.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2020.
215   $a1 online resource (198 pages)
225 1 $aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,$x2192-6255 ;$v55
311   $a3-030-42904-0 
327   $aChapter 1: The Epistemological Situation of Cassirer -- Chapter 2. The Functional Viewpoint in Physics and its Consequences on the Symbolic Aspect of Knowledge in General -- Chapter 3: the Semiotic Situation of Cassirer -- Chapter 4. Introduction to the Notion of Symbolic Form -- Chapter 5: the Three Operators of Semiosis: Expression, Evocation, Objectification.
330   $aThis book presents the transformation of Cassirer?s transcendental point of view. At an early stage, Cassirer was confronted with a scientific crisis triggered by the emergence of various forms of objective knowledge, such as the plurality of geometric axiom systems and non-Euclidean geometry in relativistic physics. He finally developed a solution to the problematic unity of objective knowledge by replacing the overarching notion of objectivity with that of forms of objectification. This led him to consider the notion of ?symbolic forms? as the driving force in the objectification process. This concept would become instrumental in demonstrating that the objective and human sciences are not adversaries; they merely differ in their modes of semiotic construction. These modes cannot be summarized in a fixed list of symbolic forms but operate transversally, at a level where Cassirer distinguishes between three specific operators: Expression, Evocation and Objectification. The last part of the book investigates how the relationships between these three operators stabilize specific symbolic forms. Four of these forms are then studied as examples: Myth and Ritual, Language, Scientific Knowledge, and Technology.
410  0$aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,$x2192-6255 ;$v55
606   $aPhilosophy and science
606   $aSemiotics
606   $aEpistemology
606   $aPhilosophy of Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E34000
606   $aSemiotics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/N53000
606   $aEpistemology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E13000
615  0$aPhilosophy and science.
615  0$aSemiotics.
615  0$aEpistemology.
615 14$aPhilosophy of Science.
615 24$aSemiotics.
615 24$aEpistemology.
676   $a193
700   $aLassègue$b Jean$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0781491
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910390860103321
996   $aCassirer?s Transformation: From a Transcendental to a Semiotic Philosophy of Forms$92212234
997   $aUNINA