LEADER 04490nam 22006735 450 001 9910380751303321 005 20200702115427.0 010 $a3-030-28760-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-28760-3 035 $a(CKB)4100000010473879 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6121772 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-28760-3 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000010473879 100 $a20200219d2020 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aReclaiming Liberalism$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by David F. Hardwick, Leslie Marsh 205 $a1st ed. 2020. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource (332 pages) 225 1 $aPalgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism,$x2662-6470 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a3-030-28759-9 327 $a1. Reclaiming Democratic Classical Liberalism; David Ellerman -- 2. Democracy, Liberalism, and Discretion: The Political Puzzle of the Administrative State; Stephen Turner -- 3. Ordoliberalism as the Operationalisation of Liberal Politics; Mikayla Novak -- 4. Liberalism, Through a Glass Darkly; David F. Hardwick and Leslie Marsh -- 5. Liberalism and the Nine Waves of Modern Freedom; David D. Corey -- 6. Liberalism for the 21st Century: From markets to civil society, from economics to human beings; Gus diZerega -- 7. The Origins of the Rule of Law; Andrew Irvine -- 8. Burke?s Liberalism: Prejudice, Habit, and Affections and the Remaking of the Social Contract; Lauren Hall -- 9. Democratic Peace Theory, Montesquieu, and Public Choice; Sarah Burns and Chad Van Schoelandt -- 10. ?China?s Hayek? and the Horrors of Totalitarianism: the Liberal Lessons in Gu Zhun?s Thought; Chor-yung Cheung. 330 $a?David Hardwick and Leslie Marsh have assembled a contentious collection of independent thinkers on liberalism?s identity and prospects. Should liberalism be democratic, classical, ordo, legalistic, culture-based, market-based, or what? The international crew of authors?from Australia, Canada, China and the USA?draw upon the insights of key historic figures from Locke to Montesquieu to Burke to Dewey to Hayek to Rawls (and of course others, given liberalism?s rich history), and they leave us with a set of liberalisms both in collision and in overlapping agreement. This book is stimulating reading for those engaged with next-generation liberal thought.? ?Stephen R. C. Hicks, Professor of Philosophy at Rockford University. This collection redresses the conceptual hubris and illiteracy that has come to obscure the central presuppositions of classical liberalism ? that is, the wrestling of epistemic independence from overwhelming concentrations of power, monopolies and capricious zealotries be they of a state, religious or corporate in character. . 410 0$aPalgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism,$x2662-6470 606 $aSchools of economics 606 $aPolitical philosophy 606 $aPolitical theory 606 $aPolitical economy 606 $aEconomic policy 606 $aHeterodox Economics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W53000 606 $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000 606 $aPolitical Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911010 606 $aInternational Political Economy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912140 606 $aEconomic Policy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W34010 615 0$aSchools of economics. 615 0$aPolitical philosophy. 615 0$aPolitical theory. 615 0$aPolitical economy. 615 0$aEconomic policy. 615 14$aHeterodox Economics. 615 24$aPolitical Philosophy. 615 24$aPolitical Theory. 615 24$aInternational Political Economy. 615 24$aEconomic Policy. 676 $a320.51 702 $aHardwick$b David F$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aMarsh$b Leslie$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910380751303321 996 $aReclaiming Liberalism$91914866 997 $aUNINA