LEADER 03346nam  22006375  450 
001 9910380737303321
005 20251202165835.0
010   $a981-15-3521-3
024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-15-3521-5
035   $a(CKB)4100000010480221
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6126791
035   $a(DE-He213)978-981-15-3521-5
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6126480
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000010480221
100   $a20200229d2020      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aDialectic of Enlightenment in the Anglosphere $eHorkheimer and Adorno's Remnants of Freedom /$fby Howard Prosser
205   $a1st ed. 2020.
210  1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Nature Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2020.
215   $a1 online resource (194 pages)
311 08$a981-15-3520-5 
327   $aForeword -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1.Composing Dialectic of Enlightenment -- 2.Reviving Dialectic of Enlightenment -- 3.A North American Dialectic of Enlightenment -- 4.Dialectic of Enlightenment and Habermasian Revision -- 5.Dialectic of Enlightenment and the British New Left -- 6.Dialectic of Enlightenment and Postmodernism -- 7.Dialectic of Enlightenment and Cultural Studies -- 8.Dialectic of Enlightenment and Others: Postcolonialism and Feminism -- 9.Dialectic of Enlightenment?s Future -- Conclusion -- Bibliography.
330   $aThis book explores the reception of Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno?s Dialectic of Enlightenment. It examines a variety of perspectives on the text, supplied by e.g. American critical theorists, British New Leftists, Transatlantic Cultural Studies scholars, Postmodernists, and those working in the current after-theory moment from 1970 to 2010. It considers the works of the Frankfurt School, especially Horkheimer and Adorno, alongside the secondary literature on the subject. The main focus is on how various intellectual circles and trends have responded to the Dialectic, making scholarly discussions the primary sources. While the work is a history of the Dialectic of Enlightenment?s Anglophone reception, it also reflects the post-1968 left?s retreat to academia, which echoes the Frankfurt School?s own stance of political resignation. .
606   $aCritical theory
606   $aSocial sciences$xPhilosophy
606   $aPolitical science
606   $aComparative literature
606   $aPhilosophy$xHistory
606   $aCritical Theory
606   $aSocial Theory
606   $aPolitical Theory
606   $aComparative Literature
606   $aHistory of Philosophy
615  0$aCritical theory.
615  0$aSocial sciences$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aPolitical science.
615  0$aComparative literature.
615  0$aPhilosophy$xHistory.
615 14$aCritical Theory.
615 24$aSocial Theory.
615 24$aPolitical Theory.
615 24$aComparative Literature.
615 24$aHistory of Philosophy.
676   $a190.9033
700   $aProsser$b Howard$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0928044
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910380737303321
996   $aDialectic of Enlightenment in the Anglosphere$92085011
997   $aUNINA