LEADER 01498nas 2200457- 450 001 9910370354803321 005 20200608061546.3 035 $a(OCoLC)752309063 035 $a(CKB)2560000000077855 035 $a(CONSER)--2011203350 035 $a(DE-599)ZDB2739830-4 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000077855 100 $a20110914a20119999 --- a 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aJournal of historical syntax 210 1$aWashington DC :$cLinguistic Society of America,$d2012- 210 31$aKonstanz :$cUniversity of Konstanz 300 $aRefereed/Peer-reviewed 311 08$a2163-6001 517 1 $aHistorical syntax 531 0 $aJ. hist. syntax 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax$vPeriodicals 606 $aHistorical linguistics$vPeriodicals 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00946258 606 $aHistorical linguistics$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00958134 608 $aPeriodicals.$2fast 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax 615 0$aHistorical linguistics 615 7$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax. 615 7$aHistorical linguistics. 676 $a415 712 02$aUniversität Konstanz. 712 02$aLinguistic Society of America. 906 $aJOURNAL 912 $a9910370354803321 996 $aJournal of historical syntax$91984251 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04462nam 22005655 450 001 9910588779503321 005 20231110233747.0 010 $a3-11-078469-6 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110784695 035 $a(CKB)5700000000103315 035 $a(DE-B1597)617752 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110784695 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7070278 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7070278 035 $a(OCoLC)1337590118 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/91556 035 $a(oapen)doab91556 035 $a(oapen)doab91495 035 $a(EXLCZ)995700000000103315 100 $a20220830h20222022 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe expression of ?collectivity? in Romance languages $eAn empirical analysis of nominal aspectuality with focus on French /$fDésirée Kleineberg 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aBerlin/Boston$cDe Gruyter$d2022 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston : $cDe Gruyter, $d[2022] 210 4$d©2022 215 $a1 online resource (XVII, 317 p.) 225 0 $aBeihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie ,$x0084-5396 ;$v472 311 08$a3-11-078458-0 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tAcknowledgements -- $tContents -- $tList of figures -- $tList of tables -- $tList of abbreviations -- $tIntroduction -- $tI Theoretical foundations -- $t1 Nominal aspectuality and number -- $t2 Interim summary: From nominal aspectuality to collection nouns -- $t3 Collection nouns: State of the art and definitional delimitation -- $tII The synchronic characteristics of collection nouns in present-day language -- $tIntroduction -- $t4 Semantic-syntactic characteristics: An acceptability judgement study on count collective nouns and object mass nouns -- $t5 Morphological characteristics: A corpus analysis of collective nonce-formations -- $t6 Conclusion: Linguistic characterisation of Romance collection nouns in present-day language -- $tIII The diachronic development of French collection nouns -- $tIntroduction -- $t7 State of the art: The assumed paths of lexicalisation of collection nouns -- $t8 Lexicalisation of collection nouns: Corpus analysis in Frantext -- $t9 Conclusion and discussion: Linguistic characterisation of collection nouns in language evolution -- $tIV General conclusion and outlook -- $t10 Summary of the results and conclusion -- $t11 Outlook -- $t12 References -- $tSubject index 330 $aWhile previous research on collective nouns in Romance languages mostly adopts a semasiological and theoretical perspective focusing mainly on one single language, the present study takes an onomasiological and comparative approach which is strongly based on empirical evidence. Against this background and in analogy to the verbal domain, the work elaborates further the functional category of nominal aspectuality which describes the construal of extra-linguistic entities as well as the linguistic means reflecting it. In this sense, collective nouns are systematically compared with other (nominal) means of expression of collectivity in French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, focusing especially on object mass nouns, which have hardly been studied so far for Romance languages. On the basis of corpus analyses and acceptability judgement studies, a holistic picture is thus drawn of the semantic-syntactic and derivational properties of various noun types in the synchrony of present-day language as well as of the diachronic lexicalisation paths of these very nouns. The work thus contributes to the understanding of the verbalisation of pluralities by linking and complementing previous monodimensional approaches and, above all, by placing them on a broad empirical basis. 410 0$aBeihefte Zur Zeitschrift Für Romanische Philologie 606 $aCorpora (Linguistics) 606 $aRomance languages$xCollective nouns 606 $aFOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY / French$2bisacsh 615 0$aCorpora (Linguistics) 615 0$aRomance languages$xCollective nouns. 615 7$aFOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY / French. 676 $a440.04554 700 $aKleineberg$b Désirée, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01254471 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910588779503321 996 $aThe expression of ?collectivity? in Romance languages$92908574 997 $aUNINA