LEADER 03363nam 22004935 450 001 9910370050803321 005 20200630204912.0 010 $a3-658-28499-4 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-658-28499-2 035 $a(CKB)4100000009678365 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5971214 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-658-28499-2 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000009678365 100 $a20191029d2020 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPhilanthropic Foundations and Social Welfare $eA Comparative Study of Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom (England) /$fby Sarah Förster 205 $a1st ed. 2020. 210 1$aWiesbaden :$cSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :$cImprint: Springer VS,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource (252 pages) 311 $a3-658-28498-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aResearch Problem and Broader Research Context -- Welfare Regimes and the Underlying Logic of Country Differences -- Plan of Inquiry -- Country Case Studies -- Regime Influence, Theoretical Propositions. . 330 $aThe existing welfare regime literature identifies differences in welfare state systems. Sarah Förster asks, if we can learn something on the organizational level about the embedding of philanthropic foundations in the field of social welfare in different welfare state systems. This investigation is based on comparative insights from the three country cases of Germany, Sweden and the UK (England). Guided by propositions from theoretical analysis of welfare regime literature, comparative explorative case studies based on interview data and secondary sources give insights into the field and the embedding of philanthropic social welfare foundations in the three different welfare state systems. Each type of foundation has different levels of independence from external constraints and is embedded to different degrees according to the propositions from welfare regime theory. These differences hold further implications for the investigation of foundations as a special organizational form. Contents Research Problem and Broader Research Context Welfare Regimes and the Underlying Logic of Country Differences Plan of Inquiry Country Case Studies Regime Influence, Theoretical Propositions Target Groups Researchers and students of sociology and political science Foundation managers, politicians, practitioners in welfare associations, and social service providers The Author Sarah Förster works at the Office for Research and Innovation at the Technical University of Munich. 606 $aSociology 606 $aSocial policy 606 $aSociological Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22060 606 $aSocial Policy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X33000 615 0$aSociology. 615 0$aSocial policy. 615 14$aSociological Theory. 615 24$aSocial Policy. 676 $a361.70943 700 $aFörster$b Sarah$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0942272 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910370050803321 996 $aPhilanthropic Foundations and Social Welfare$92126292 997 $aUNINA