LEADER 03349 am 22004093u 450 001 9910367723003321 005 20210524142051.0 035 $a(CKB)4100000010106471 035 $a(OAPEN)1006700 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000010106471 100 $a20200114d|||| uy 101 0 $adut 135 $auuuuu---auuuu 200 00$aOver taalbewustzijn en taalvariatie 210 $aGent$cAcademia Press$d2019 215 $a1 online resource (220) 311 $a94-014-6244-5 330 $aThe study scrutinizes the effects of language awareness on teachers? conceptualization of language variation. Teacher language awareness has been discussed mostly for the case of English and with regard to grammar, and is defined as being determined by knowledge and reflexion (Andrews 2008, Svalberg 2012). This study aims at examining the reach of the concept for other languages, here Dutch, and for other terrains, in this case, language variation, thus stretching the application also into the realm of language ideology. According to Kroskrity (2006, 2016), language ideologies are (1) not knowledge but ??notions?, ?beliefs? or ?ideas?, which (2) are about language, the role(s) of language and its nature, and which (3) are constructed by individuals and groups in interaction with each other to (4) rationalize and justify social relations. In this linguistic-ethnographic study, a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with teachers of Dutch at eight European universities shows that knowledge and reflection play a considerable role for how teachers conceptualize language variation in class. Overall, four different types of teacher language awareness came to the fore, based on different interplays of both knowledge and reflection: standard language ideology alive, strong focus on prescription, doubting and linguistic insecurity and dynamic equilibrium. The overall results show the importance of teacher language awareness in language classes and help to boil down the vague notion of language awareness on language variation to two major defining factors, namely knowledge and reflection. Further, the study shows that language classrooms may be seen as ?ideological sites? (Silverstein (1979, 1998)), in which language ideology may be either reproduced or deconstructed, depending on the language awareness of the teacher. The consequences of the study for language teacher education are a plea for an informed, reflected, differentiated and integrative treatment of language variation in language class. 606 $aDutch$2bicssc 606 $aFlemish$2bicssc 606 $aSociolinguistics$2bicssc 606 $aLanguage learning: specific skills$2bicssc 606 $aHigher & further education, tertiary education$2bicssc 606 $aTeaching skills & techniques$2bicssc 606 $aTeaching of a specific subject$2bicssc 615 7$aDutch 615 7$aFlemish 615 7$aSociolinguistics 615 7$aLanguage learning: specific skills 615 7$aHigher & further education, tertiary education 615 7$aTeaching skills & techniques 615 7$aTeaching of a specific subject 700 $aWilde $b Truus de$4aut$0893925 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910367723003321 996 $aOver taalbewustzijn en taalvariatie$91996891 997 $aUNINA