LEADER 04104nam 2200793 450 001 9910808118903321 005 20230912135143.0 010 $a1-282-03714-5 010 $a9786612037146 010 $a1-4426-7902-6 024 7 $a10.3138/9781442679023 035 $a(CKB)2420000000004309 035 $a(EBL)3255370 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000307722 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11277569 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000307722 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10252011 035 $a(PQKB)10908839 035 $a(CaBNvSL)thg00600601 035 $a(DE-B1597)479176 035 $a(OCoLC)992483086 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781442679023 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4671881 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11257570 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL203714 035 $a(OCoLC)815768977 035 $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/r8fm19 035 $a(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/6/417935 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4671881 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_105146 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3255370 035 $a(EXLCZ)992420000000004309 100 $a20160923h19991999 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aReading theatre /$fAnne Ubersfeld ; translated by Frank Collins ; edited and with a foreword by Paul Perron and Patrick Debbeche 210 1$aToronto, [Ontario] ;$aBuffalo, [New York] ;$aLondon, [England] :$cUniversity of Toronto Press,$d1999. 210 4$d©1999 215 $a1 online resource (244 p.) 225 1 $aToronto Studies in Semiotics and Communication 300 $aTranslation of: Lire le the?a?tre. 311 $a0-8020-8240-8 311 $a0-8020-4455-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aCh. I. Text-performance -- ch. II. The actantial model in theatre -- ch. III. The character -- ch. IV. Theatre and space -- ch. V. Theatre and time -- ch. VI. Theatrical discourse -- A prelude to performance. 330 $aFirst published in France in 1976, Anne Ubersfeld's three-volume work, Lire le theatre, has made a resounding impact on the semiological study of drama. Reading Theatre is a long-awaited translation of the first volume.Clear and systematic in its approach, the book covers all the basic elements of theatrical text and performance. Ubersfeld begins by refuting the view of performance as the simple 'translation' of a dramatic text, and outlines a much more complex dynamic. In subsequent chapters she similarly begins with a brief critique of simplistic models and then teases out the complexities of action, character, space, time, and dialogue. A range of specific examples brings substance and clarity to her points.Ubersfeld shows how such formal analysis can enrich the work of theatre practitioners, offering a fruitful reading of the symbolic structures of stage space and time, and opening up multiple possibilities for interpreting a play's lines of action. Though firmly grounded in formalist and semiotic studies, the book exhibits a refreshing scepticism about scientific positivism, stressing the fundamental ambiguity of any dramatic text as well as the sociohistorical grounding of particular text and performance styles.A pioneering work, this contemporary classic continues to inform debates in theatre semiotics. Addressed as much to actors and directors as to students and scholars, it will be read widely in theatre circles throughout the English-speaking world. 410 0$aToronto studies in semiotics. 606 $aTheater$xPhilosophy 606 $aTheater$xSemiotics 608 $aLivres numeriques. 608 $ae-books. 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aTheater$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aTheater$xSemiotics. 676 $a792/.01/4 700 $aUbersfeld$b Anne$0155374 702 $aCollins$b Frank 702 $aPerron$b Paul 702 $aDebbe?che$b Patrick 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910808118903321 996 $aReading theatre$94063266 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03165nam 2200409z- 450 001 9910367721203321 005 20210212 035 $a(CKB)4920000000095667 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63092 035 $a(oapen)doab63092 035 $a(EXLCZ)994920000000095667 100 $a20202102d2011 |y 0 101 0 $aspa 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$ażLegado de deuda? A vueltas con la Pandecti?stica 210 $cUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid. Figuerola Institute of Social Science History$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (158 p.) 225 1 $aHistoria del Derecho 311 08$a84-15454-41-4 327 $aUna afirmacio?n que induce a la reflexio?n -- Indagando en las fuentes -- Explicaciones a un por que?: Legatum debiti et utilitas -- Lo que la apariencia esconde: "Legatum debiti" et "Fraus legi" -- Recapitulando -- A vueltas con la Pandecti?stica -- A modo de conclusio?n: Historia, continuidades y discontinuidades. 330 $aObjeto de esta investigacio?n que engloba Derecho romano, Ciencia juri?dica alemana del siglo XIX, y Derecho civil actual, es el denominado "legatum debiti". Disposicio?n testamentaria en virtud de la cual el "de cuius" atribuye a su acreedor una cosa o cantidad en consideracio?n de una deuda que con e?l teni?a. Este trabajo pone de manifiesto que la construccio?n dogma?tica del "legatum debiti" tiene su fundamento en el Derecho romano; si bien no en las fuentes cla?sicas y justinianeas, sino en la elaboracio?n que de e?stas hizo la doctrina pandecti?stica. Las razones que justificari?an el recurso a esta figura juri?dica por parte del testador: fines li?citos (introducir algu?n cambio en la relacio?n obligatoria que se traduci?a en una ventaja para el acreedor; purificacio?n de la obligacio?n que se debi?a a condicio?n o te?rmino; sustitucio?n de la accio?n honoraria por accio?n civil; renuncia impli?cita a una excepcio?n, o exigibilidad inmediata o en lugar ma?s conveniente para el acreedor). Fines ili?citos (favorecer a trave?s del testamento a alguien que, de otro modo, no habri?a podido heredar-vulneracio?n leyes caducari?as y Falcidia-). Se analizan, asimismo, los tratados de Pandectas, tanto de autores pertenecientes a la primera generacio?n de alumnos de Savigny, como de otros pertenecientes a la ciencia juri?dica alemana de la segunda mitad del siglo XIX. Se concluye aludiendo a la inexistencia en el BGB de alusio?n alguna al "legado de deuda" pese a su influencia pandecti?stica. 606 $aClaims against decedents' estates (Roman law) 606 $aLegacies (Roman law) 606 $aLaw$zGermany$xPhilosophy 606 $aRoman law$xReception 615 0$aClaims against decedents' estates (Roman law) 615 0$aLegacies (Roman law) 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aRoman law$xReception. 700 $aCarrasco Garci?a$b Consuelo$0421249 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910367721203321 996 $ażLegado de deuda$93397155 997 $aUNINA