LEADER 03915 am  22006373u 450 
001 9910366574503321
005 20200702063018.0
010   $a3-662-59732-2
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3
035   $a(CKB)4100000009273610
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-662-59732-3
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5896698
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5896698
035   $a(OCoLC)1132429349
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000009273610
100   $a20190911d2020      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn#008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aFrom Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court$b[electronic resource] $eOptions Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement /$fby Marc Bungenberg, August Reinisch
205   $a2nd ed. 2020.
210  1$aBerlin, Heidelberg :$cSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :$cImprint: Springer,$d2020.
215   $a1 online resource (xiv, 222 pages)
225 1 $aSpecial Issue,$x2510-6880
311   $a3-662-59731-4 
327   $aFM -- Executive Summary -- Introduction -- Targets for the Reorganization of the Investment Protection Regime -- Design and Implementation of a Two-Tiered MIC -- Applicable Law -- The Pronoucement of Decisions and Its Consequences -- Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions.-Possibilities for the Establishment of an MIC and a Possible Connection to Existing Institutions and System Conformity -- Standalone Appeal Mechanism: ?Multilateral Investment Appeals Mechanism? (MIAM)  -- Index.
330   $aThis open access book considers the potential setup for a future Multilateral Investment Court (MIC). The option of an MIC was first discussed by the EU Commission in 2016 and has since been made an official element of the EU Common Commercial Policy. In 2017, UNCITRAL also decided to discuss the possibility of an MIC, and on 20 March 2018, the Council of the EU gave the EU Commission the mandate to negotiate the creation of an MIC. The ?feasibility study? presented here is intended to contribute to a broader discussion on the options for a new international court specialized in investment protection. The cornerstones of such a new permanent court are a strict orientation on the rule of law, reduced costs of investment protection, transparency considerations, aspects of consistency in case law, and the effective enforceability of MIC decisions.
410  0$aSpecial Issue,$x2510-6880
606   $aMediation
606   $aDispute resolution (Law)
606   $aConflict management
606   $aInternational law
606   $aTrade
606   $aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R22000
606   $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19050
606   $aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19010
615  0$aMediation.
615  0$aDispute resolution (Law).
615  0$aConflict management.
615  0$aInternational law.
615  0$aTrade.
615 14$aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.
615 24$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
615 24$aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
676   $a347.09
700   $aBungenberg$b Marc$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0787615
702   $aReinisch$b August$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910366574503321
996   $aFrom Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court$92092096
997   $aUNINA