LEADER 03887nam  22006255  450 
001 9910350212203321
005 20210112191901.0
010   $a981-13-2928-1
024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-13-2928-9
035   $a(CKB)4100000007335215
035   $a(DE-He213)978-981-13-2928-9
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5627096
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007335215
100   $a20181230d2019      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe India?Korea CEPA$b[electronic resource] $eAn Analysis of Industrial Competitiveness and Environmental and Resource Implications /$fby Sudhakar Yedla, Choongjae Cho
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (XI, 68 p. 30 illus., 27 illus. in color.) 
225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Economics,$x2191-5504
311   $a981-13-2927-3 
327   $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Pattern of Trade between India and the Korean Republic -- Chapter 3. Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) ? Basic Constructs and Key Features -- Chapter 4. Impacts of CEPA on trade between India and Korea -- Chapter 5. Qualitative analysis of CEPA?s impact on the Environment and Natural Resources Base in India and Korea -- Chapter 6. Concluding Remarks.
330   $aThis book assesses the changes that the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) could produce by boosting the competitiveness of firms in India and Korea. It evaluates the CEPA in terms of its effects on the environment and natural resources of the importing and exporting countries alike. Further, it employs the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) and relative trade advantage (RTA) methods of analysis to gauge the influence of the CEPA on industrial competitiveness in both host and receiving countries. While the CEPA would increase trade between India and Korea in their respective strong domains, the book argues that, given the nature of the exported and imported goods and products, India would be more susceptible to serious environmental impacts than would Korea. The book subsequently presents these impacts in a qualitative framework and stresses the need for a comprehensive valuation of not only environmental impacts, but also the losses due to tariff cuts and the gains due to increased trade between the two countries.
410  0$aSpringerBriefs in Economics,$x2191-5504
606   $aTrade
606   $aSocial policy
606   $aEnvironmental policy
606   $aInternational business enterpris
606   $aIndustrial organization
606   $aTrade$3http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/527010
606   $aSocial Policy$3http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/W34020
606   $aEnvironmental Policy$3http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/X33040
606   $aInternational Business$3http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/525000
606   $aIndustrial Organization$3http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/W31010
615  0$aTrade.
615  0$aSocial policy.
615  0$aEnvironmental policy.
615  0$aInternational business enterpris.
615  0$aIndustrial organization.
615 14$aTrade.
615 24$aSocial Policy.
615 24$aEnvironmental Policy.
615 24$aInternational Business.
615 24$aIndustrial Organization.
676   $a381
700   $aYedla$b Sudhakar$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0953794
702   $aCho$b Choongjae$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910350212203321
996   $aThe India?Korea CEPA$92156541
997   $aUNINA