LEADER 04051nam  22006495  450 
001 9910349549903321
005 20210325162154.0
010   $a3-030-23100-3
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2
035   $a(CKB)4100000009040842
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5852240
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-23100-2
035   $a(PPN)270729453
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000009040842
100   $a20190817d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aOliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience /$fby Jay Schulkin
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (358 pages)
311   $a3-030-23099-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a1. Introduction -- 2. Holmes' Critical Experience in War -- 3. Experience, Inference and Surviving -- 4. Holmes, Pragmatism and Nature -- 5. Duty, Surviving, Social Contract -- 6. Emersonian Sensibilities -- 7. Bounded Choice, Human Freedom and Problem Solving -- 8. Naturalizing Decision-Making -- 9. Ethics, Body Politic, and Neuroscience -- 10. Neuroscientific Considerations and the Law -- 11. Conclusion. .
330   $aThis book explores the cultures of philosophy and the law as they interact with neuroscience and biology, through the perspective of American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes? Jr., and the pragmatist tradition of John Dewey. Schulkin proposes that human problem solving and the law are tied to a naturalistic, realistic and an anthropological understanding of the human condition. The situated character of legal reasoning, given its complexity, like reasoning in neuroscience, can be notoriously fallible. Legal and scientific reasoning is to be understood within a broader context in order to emphasize both the continuity and the porous relationship between the two. Some facts of neuroscience fit easily into discussions of human experience and the law. However, it is important not to oversell neuroscience: a meeting of law and neuroscience is unlikely to prove persuasive in the courtroom any time soon. Nevertheless, as knowledge of neuroscience becomes more reliable and more easily accepted by both the larger legislative community and in the wider public, through which neuroscience filters into epistemic and judicial reliability, the two will ultimately find themselves in front of a judge. A pragmatist view of neuroscience will aid and underlie these events.
606   $aPragmatism
606   $aPolitical science
606   $aPolitical philosophy
606   $aLaw?Philosophy
606   $aLaw
606   $aPhilosophy of mind
606   $aPragmatism$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E38000
606   $aPhilosophy of Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E27000
606   $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000
606   $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R11011
606   $aPhilosophy of Mind$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E31000
615  0$aPragmatism.
615  0$aPolitical science.
615  0$aPolitical philosophy.
615  0$aLaw?Philosophy.
615  0$aLaw.
615  0$aPhilosophy of mind.
615 14$aPragmatism.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Law.
615 24$aPolitical Philosophy.
615 24$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Mind.
676   $a347.732634
676   $a340.1
700   $aSchulkin$b Jay$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0869275
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910349549903321
996   $aOliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience$92033375
997   $aUNINA